Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 19:11:1123183.
doi: 10.3389/fped.2023.1123183. eCollection 2023.

Assisted reproductive techniques do not impact late neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm children

Affiliations

Assisted reproductive techniques do not impact late neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm children

Tiphaine Lefebvre et al. Front Pediatr. .

Abstract

Objective: Assisted reproductive technology (ART) increases the rate of preterm births, though few studies have analyzed outcomes for these infants. No data are available on 4-year-old children born prematurely after ART. The objective was to investigate whether ART affect the neurodevelopmental outcomes at 4 years in preterm infants born before 34 weeks of gestational age (GA).

Methods and results: A total of 166 ART and 679 naturally conceived preterm infants born before 34 weeks GA between 2013 and 2015 enrolled in the Loire Infant Follow-up Team were included. Neurodevelopment was assessed at 4 years using the age and stage questionnaire (ASQ) and the need for therapy services. The association between the socio-economic and perinatal characteristics and non-optimal neurodevelopment at 4 years was estimated. After adjustment, the ART preterm group remained significantly associated with a lower risk of having at least two domains in difficulty at ASQ: adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) (0.13-0.88), p = 0.027. The factors independently associated with non-optimal neurodevelopment at 4 years were male gender, low socio-economic level, and 25-30 weeks of GA at birth. The need for therapy services was similar between groups (p = 0.079). The long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes of preterm children born after ART are very similar, or even better than that of the spontaneously conceived children.

Keywords: assisted reproductive technology; cognitive development; follow-up; in vitro fertilization; prematurity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Neurodevelopment at 4 years in ART and naturally conceived preterm. (A) Mean ASQ score. (B) Difficulty in at least one ASQ domain. (C) Difficulty in at least two ASQ domains. (D) Need for therapy services at 4 years. ART, assisted reproductive technology; ASQ, age and stage questionnaire.

Similar articles

References

    1. Pinborg A. Short- and long-term outcomes in children born after assisted reproductive technology. BJOG. (2019) 126(2):145–8. 10.1111/1471-0528.15437 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chen M, Heilbronn LK. The health outcomes of human offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies (ART). J Dev Orig Health Dis. (2017) 8(4):388–402. 10.1017/S2040174417000228 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blencowe H, Cousens S, Oestergaard MZ, Chou D, Moller A-B, Narwal R, et al. National, regional, and worldwide estimates of preterm birth rates in the year 2010 with time trends since 1990 for selected countries: a systematic analysis and implications. Lancet. (2012) 379(9832):2162–72. 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60820-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kulkarni AD, Jamieson DJ, Jones HW, Kissin DM, Gallo MF, Macaluso M, et al. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States. N Engl J Med. (2013) 369(23):2218–25. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301467 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonald SD, Han Z, Mulla S, Ohlsson A, Beyene J, Murphy KE. Preterm birth and low birth weight among in vitro fertilization twins: a systematic review and meta-analyses. Eur J Obstetr Gynecol Reprod Biol. (2010) 148(2):105–13. 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2009.09.019 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources