Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 19:13:1136380.
doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1136380. eCollection 2023.

Efficacy and safety of inetetamab-containing regimens in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a real-world retrospective study in China

Affiliations

Efficacy and safety of inetetamab-containing regimens in patients with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: a real-world retrospective study in China

Xiaoyu Liu et al. Front Oncol. .

Abstract

Background: Inetetamab (cipterbin) is an innovative anti-HER2 humanized monoclonal antibody. The efficacy and safety of a combination of inetetamab and vinorelbine in the first-line treatment of human epidermal receptor positive (HER2+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC) have been confirmed. We aimed to investigate real-world data of inetetamab in complex clinical practice.

Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who received inetetamab as a salvage treatment at any line setting from July 2020 to June 2022. The main endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results: A total of 64 patients were included in this analysis. The median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.6 (4.6-6.6) months. Of the patients, 62.5% received two or more lines of therapy before treatment with inetetamab. The most common chemotherapy and anti-HER2 regimens combined with inetetamab were vinorelbine (60.9%) and pyrotinib (62.5%), respectively. Patients treated with inetetamab plus pyrotinib plus vinorelbine benefited the most (p=0.048), with the mPFS of 9.3 (3.1-15.5) months and an objective response rate of 35.5%. For patients with pyrotinib pretreatment, inetetamab plus vinorelbine plus pyrotinib agents resulted in mPFS of 10.3 (5.2-15.4) months. Regimens (inetetamab plus vinorelbine plus pyrotinib vs. other therapeutic agents) and visceral metastases (yes vs. no) were independent predictors of PFS. Patients with visceral metastases treated with inetetamab plus vinorelbine plus pyrotinib had a mPFS of 6.1(5.1-7.1) months. The toxicity of inetetamab was tolerable, with the most common grade 3/4 adverse event being leukopenia (4.7%).

Conclusions: HER2+ MBC patients pretreated with multiple-line therapies still respond to inetetamab-based treatment. Inetetamab combined with vinorelbine and pyrotinib may be the most effective treatment regimen, with a controllable and tolerable safety profile.

Keywords: breast cancer; human epidermal receptor 2 positive; inetetamab; monoclonal antibody; real-word data.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

XW was employed by REMEGEN, LTD. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Patient’s profile.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS for patients. (A) Overall cohort; (B) Patients stratified by treatment lines; (C) Patients with different metastatic sites.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS and responses for different treatment. (A) Patients treated with different dual anti-HER2 therapy; (B) Patients treated with different chemotherapy; (C) Patients treated with different combined regimens.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS for patients and responses. (A) Patients with vinorelbine‐treated or vinorelbine‐naive; (B) Patients with pyrotinib‐treated or pyrotinib‐naive; (C) Patients who were pyrotinib‐treated received inetetamab + vinorelbine + pyrotinib or other therapeutic agents.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Kaplan–Meier curves of PFS for patients and responses in subgroup. (A) Patients with visceral metastasis or not; (B) Visceral metastasis patients treated with pyrotinib or pyrotinib + trastuzumab.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. . Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2021) 71:209–49. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Barzaman K, Karami J, Zarei Z, Hosseinzadeh A, Kazemi MH, Moradi-Kalbolandi S, et al. . Breast cancer: biology, biomarkers, and treatments. Int Immunopharmacol (2020) 84:106535. doi: 10.1016/j.intimp.2020.106535 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Waks AG, Winer EP. Breast cancer treatment: a review. JAMA (2019) 321:288–300. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.19323 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Radenkovic S, Konjevic G, Isakovic A, Stevanovic P, Gopcevic K, Jurisic V. HER2-positive breast cancer patients: correlation between mammographic and pathological findings. Radiat Prot Dosimetry (2014) 162:125–8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncu243 - DOI - PubMed
    1. O'Grady S, Morgan MP. Microcalcifications in breast cancer: from pathophysiology to diagnosis and prognosis. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer (2018) 1869:310–20. doi: 10.1016/j.bbcan.2018.04.006 - DOI - PubMed