The Impact of Reference Standard on Diagnostic Testing Characteristics for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review
- PMID: 37404780
- PMCID: PMC10317486
- DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005067
The Impact of Reference Standard on Diagnostic Testing Characteristics for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: A Systematic Review
Abstract
Lack of a reliable reference standard for carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) diagnosis could impact the diagnostic test characteristics. This systematic review sought to evaluate differences in the accuracy of CTS diagnostic modalities based on the reference standard used.
Methods: A systematic review was performed following PRISMA guidelines to investigate diagnostic modalities used in CTS. A literature search of Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Reviews was conducted for the years of 2010-2021 for primary data, and 113 studies met final inclusion criteria. Studies were stratified based on the reference standard utilized and diagnostic modality assessed, and the weighted means of the sensitivities and specificities were calculated.
Results: Thirty-five studies used clinical diagnosis alone as a reference standard, and 78 studies used electrodiagnostic study (EDS). The specificity for MRI and ultrasound (US) were substantially lower when EDS was used as the reference standard. MRI was the test most affected by the reference standard used, showing increased sensitivity when using EDS as the reference compared to clinical diagnosis (77.1% versus 60.9%) and decreased specificity (87.6% versus 99.2%). Regardless of the reference standard used, all tests had anticipated false-positive and/or false-negative rates of at least 10%.
Conclusions: Testing characteristics vary greatly based on the choice of reference standard, with the sensitivity of MRI most affected. Regardless of reference standard used, EDS, US, and MRI each had false-positive and/or false-negative rates too great to be appropriate for use as a screening examination.
Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial interests to declare in relation to the content of this article.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Comparison of ultrasound and electrodiagnostic testing for diagnosis of carpal tunnel syndrome: study using a validated clinical tool as the reference standard.J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Sep 3;96(17):e148. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.01250. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014. PMID: 25187592
-
Clinical utility of serologic testing for celiac disease in ontario: an evidence-based analysis.Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(21):1-111. Epub 2010 Dec 1. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010. PMID: 23074399 Free PMC article.
-
Carpal tunnel syndrome: diagnostic usefulness of sonography.Radiology. 2004 Jul;232(1):93-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2321030071. Epub 2004 May 20. Radiology. 2004. PMID: 15155897
-
Diagnosing Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Diagnostic Test Accuracy of Scales, Questionnaires, and Hand Symptom Diagrams-A Systematic Review.J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020 Nov;50(11):622-631. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2020.9599. Epub 2020 Sep 16. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020. PMID: 32938312
-
Accuracy of diagnostic clinical tests and questionnaires in screening for carpal tunnel syndrome among workers- A systematic review.J Hand Ther. 2021 Apr-Jun;34(2):179-193. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2021.04.003. Epub 2021 Apr 20. J Hand Ther. 2021. PMID: 34030953
Cited by
-
Carpal tunnel syndrome.Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024 May 23;10(1):37. doi: 10.1038/s41572-024-00521-1. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2024. PMID: 38782929 Review.
-
Comparing the Carpal Tunnel Area and Carpal Boundaries in Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Healthy Volunteers: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 May 9;15(10):1205. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15101205. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40428198 Free PMC article.
-
Diagnostic Dilemmas in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome and Cervical Spine Disorders: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Jan 7;15(2):122. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15020122. Diagnostics (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39857006 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diagnostic Accuracy of Neuromuscular Ultrasound vs. Electrodiagnostic Studies for Carpal Tunnel Syndrome: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Paired Accuracy Studies.Hand (N Y). 2024 Sep 26:15589447241278972. doi: 10.1177/15589447241278972. Online ahead of print. Hand (N Y). 2024. PMID: 39324685 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, et al. . Prevalence of carpal tunnel syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282:153–158. - PubMed
-
- Graham B, Peljovich AE, Afra R, et al. . The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons evidence-based clinical practice guideline on: management of carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016;98:1750–1754. - PubMed
-
- Jablecki CK, Andary MT, So YT, et al. . Literature review of the usefulness of nerve conduction studies and electromyography for the evaluation of patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. AAEM quality assurance committee. Muscle Nerve. 1993;16:1392–1414. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous