Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug 1;159(8):859-863.
doi: 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.1843.

Trends Over Time in Medicare for Advanced Practice Clinicians in Dermatology, 2013-2020

Affiliations

Trends Over Time in Medicare for Advanced Practice Clinicians in Dermatology, 2013-2020

Cassandra Mohr et al. JAMA Dermatol. .

Abstract

Importance: The number of advanced practice clinicians (APCs, including nurse practitioners and physician assistants) in the US is increasing. The effect this has on dermatology is unclear.

Objective: To develop a method to identify APCs practicing dermatology in claims data and to evaluate the contribution of dermatology APCs to the dermatology workforce and how this has changed over time.

Design, setting, and participants: This retrospective cohort study used the Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Data Public Use files (2013 to 2020). As APCs are not listed by specialty, a method to identify APCs practicing dermatology was developed and validated using common dermatology procedural codes. The data were analyzed from November 2022 to April 2023.

Main outcomes and measures: The proportion of clinicians and office visits by dermatology APCs and physician dermatologists were evaluated using Mann-Kendall tests. Joinpoint analysis was also used to compare the average annual percentage change of dermatology procedures and clinicians in rural-urban areas between dermatology APCs and physician dermatologists.

Results: The method to identify APCs practicing dermatology had 96% positive predictive value, 100% negative predictive value, 100% sensitivity, and 100% specificity. Between 2013 and 2020, 8444 dermatology APCs and 14 402 physician dermatologists were identified. They provided 109 366 704 office visits in Medicare. The percentage of dermatology clinicians who were APCs increased over time, from 27.7% in 2013 to 37.0% in 2020 (P = .002). The proportion of dermatologic office visits provided by APCs also increased over time, from 15.5% in 2013 to 27.4% in 2020 (P = .002). For all procedure categories, the average annual percentage change was positive for dermatology APCs (range, 10.05%-12.65%) and was higher than that of physician dermatologists. For all rural-urban designations, the average annual percentage change was positive for dermatology APCs (range, 2.03%-8.69%) and was higher than metropolitan, micropolitan, and small-town areas from that of physician dermatologists.

Conclusions and relevance: In this retrospective cohort study, there was a temporal increase in the amount of dermatologic care provided by APCs in Medicare. These findings demonstrate changes in the dermatology workforce and may have implications for dermatology as a specialty.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure.
Figure.. Physician vs Advanced Practice Clinician (APC) Breakdown in Dermatology by Practitioners and Office Visits
A, This graph shows the trends over time in dermatology clinician demographics from 2013 to 2020. The shading represents whether the practitioner was an APC (eg, a nurse practitioner or physician assistant) or whether they were a Doctor of Medicine (MD) or Doctor of Osteopathic Medicine (DO). B, This graph shows the trends over time for dermatology clinician office visits from 2013 to 2020 and whether the practitioner was an APC or MD/DO.

References

    1. Martsolf GR, Barnes H, Richards MR, Ray KN, Brom HM, McHugh MD. Employment of advanced practice clinicians in physician practices. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178(7):988-990. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.1515 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhang M, Zippin J, Kaffenberger B. Trends and scope of dermatology procedures billed by advanced practice professionals from 2012 through 2015. JAMA Dermatol. 2018;154(9):1040-1044. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2018.1768 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Coldiron B, Ratnarathorn M. Scope of physician procedures independently billed by mid-level providers in the office setting. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150(11):1153-1159. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.1773 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qi Q, Hibler BP, Coldiron B, Rossi AM. Analysis of dermatologic procedures billed independently by nonphysician practitioners in the United States. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2023;88(5):e203-e209. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kimball AB, Resneck JS Jr. The US dermatology workforce: a specialty remains in shortage. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2008;59(5):741-745. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.06.037 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types