Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Oct;112(10):2060-2065.
doi: 10.1111/apa.16900. Epub 2023 Jul 26.

Noise exposure exceeded safe limits during neonatal care and road transport but was reduced by active noise cancelling

Affiliations

Noise exposure exceeded safe limits during neonatal care and road transport but was reduced by active noise cancelling

Nurul Aminudin et al. Acta Paediatr. 2023 Oct.

Abstract

Aim: Noise levels above 45 dB in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and 60 dB during neonatal transport are recognised hazards, but protective equipment is not standard. We measured noise levels in both settings, with and without noise protection.

Methods: Peak sound and equivalent continuous sound levels were measured in a NICU and during road transport, at a mannequin's ear and inside and outside the incubator. Recordings were made without protective earwear, with noise protecting earmuffs and with active noise cancelling headphones.

Results: In the NICU, the peak levels at the ear, and inside and outside the incubator, were 61, 68 and 76 dB. The equivalent continuous sound levels were 45, 54 and 59 dB. During road transport, the respective levels were 70, 77 and 83 dB and 54, 62 and 68 dB. In the NICU, 80% of environmental peak noise reached the ear and this was reduced to 78% with earmuffs and 75% with active noise cancelling. The respective figures during transport were 87% without protection and 72% with active noise cancelling, with an unexpected increase for ear muffs.

Conclusion: Noise levels exceeded safe limits in the NICU and during transport, but active noise cancelling reduced exposure.

Keywords: active noise cancelling; neonatal intensive care unit; neonatal transport; noise exposure; noise reduction.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

REFERENCES

    1. Basner M, Babisch W, Davis A, et al. Auditory and non-auditory effects of noise on health. Lancet. 2014;383(9925):1325-1332. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61613-X
    1. Westman JC, Walters JR. Noise and stress: a comprehensive approach. Environ Health Perspect. 1981;41(October):291-309. doi:10.1289/ehp.8141291
    1. Sim CS, Sung JH, Cheon SH, Lee JM, Lee JW, Lee J. The effects of different noise types on heart rate variability in men. Yonsei Med J. 2015;56(1):235-243. doi:10.3349/ymj.2015.56.1.235
    1. Berglund B, Lindvall T, Schwela DH. WHO on community noise. 1999 pp. 1-161.
    1. Darbyshire JL, Young JD. An investigation of sound levels on intensive care units with reference to the WHO guidelines. Crit Care. 2013;17(5):R187. doi:10.1186/cc12870

LinkOut - more resources