Safety and immunogenicity against ancestral, Delta and Omicron virus variants following a booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001): Interim analysis of an open-label extension of the randomized, controlled, phase 3 COV-COMPARE trial
- PMID: 37406777
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2023.06.022
Safety and immunogenicity against ancestral, Delta and Omicron virus variants following a booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001): Interim analysis of an open-label extension of the randomized, controlled, phase 3 COV-COMPARE trial
Abstract
Objectives: Booster doses for COVID-19 vaccinations have been shown to amplify the waning immune response after primary vaccination and to enhance protection against emerging variants of concern (VoCs). Here, we aimed to assess the immunogenicity and safety of a booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001) after primary vaccination with 2 doses of either VLA2001 or ChAdOx1-S (Oxford-Astra Zeneca), including the cross-neutralization capacity against the Delta and Omicron VoCs.
Methods: This interim analysis of an open-label extension of a randomized, controlled phase 3 trial assessed a single booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001) in healthy or medically stable adults aged 18 years and above, recruited in 21 clinical sites in the UK, who had previously received two doses of either VLA2001 or ChAdOx1-S. Safety outcomes were frequency and severity of solicited injection site and systemic reactions within 7 days after booster vaccination as well as frequency and severity of any unsolicited adverse events (AE) after up to 6 months. Immunogenicity outcomes were the immune response to ancestral SARS-CoV-2 assessed 14 days post booster expressed as geometric mean titres (GMT), GMT fold ratios and seroconversion of specific neutralizing antibodies and S-protein binding IgG antibodies. Immunogenicity against the Delta and Omicron VoCs was assessed as a post-hoc outcome with a pseudovirus neutralization antibody assay. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04864561, and is ongoing.
Results: A booster dose of VLA2001 was administered to 958 participants, of whom 712 had been primed with VLA2001, and 246 with ChAdOx1-S. Within 7 days following these booster doses, 607 (63.4%) participants reported solicited injection site reactions, and 487 (50.8%) reported solicited systemic reactions. Up to 14 days post booster, 751 (78.4%) participants reported at least one adverse event. The tolerability profile of a booster dose of VLA2001 was similar in VLA2001-primed and ChAdOx1-S-primed participants. In VLA2001-primed participants, the GMT (95% CI) of neutralizing antibodies increased from 32.5 (22.8, 46.3) immediately before to 521.5 (413.0, 658.6) 2 weeks after administration of the booster dose, this corresponds to a geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of 27.7 (20.0, 38.5). Compared to 2 weeks after the second priming dose, the GMFR was 3.6 (2.8, 4.7). In the ChAdOx1-S primed group, the GMT (95% CI) of neutralizing antibodies increased from 65.8 (43.9, 98.4) immediately before to 188.3 (140.3, 252.8) 2 weeks after administration of the booster dose, a geometric mean fold rise (GMFR) of 3.0 (2.2, 4.0). Compared to 2 weeks after the second priming dose, the GMFR was 1.6 (1.1, 2.2). For S-protein binding IgG antibodies, the pre- versus post-booster GMT fold ratio (95% CI) was 34.6 (25.0, 48.0) in the VLA2001-primed group and 4.0 (3.0, 5.2) in the ChAdOx1-S-primed group. Compared to 2 weeks after the second priming dose, the GMT fold rise of IgG antibodies was 3.8 (3.2, 4.6) in the VLA2001-primed group and 1.2 (0.9, 1.6) in the ChAdOx1-S-primed group. The GMT against Delta (B.1.617.2) and Omicron (BA.4/5) increased from 4.2 to 260, and from 2.7 to 56.7, respectively, when boosting subjects previously primed with VLA2001. Following the boost, 97% of subjects primed with VLA2001 had detectable Delta- and 94% Omicron-neutralizing antibodies. In subjects primed with ChAdOx1-S, the GMT against Delta and Omicron titres increased from 9.1 to 92.5, and from 3.6 to 12.3, respectively. After boosting, 99% of subjects primed with ChAdOx1-S had detectable Delta- and 70% Omicron-neutralizing antibodies. In both VLA2001 and ChAdOx1-S primed subjects, the additional VLA2001 dose boosted T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 antigens to levels above those observed before the booster dose.
Conclusion: A booster dose of VLA2001 was safe and well tolerated after primary immunization with VLA2001 and ChAdOx1-S. The tolerability of a booster dose of VLA2001 was similar to the favourable profile observed after the first and second priming doses. Both in a homologous and a heterologous setting, boosting resulted in higher neutralizing antibody titres than after primary immunization and significant increases in cross-neutralization titres against Delta and Omicron were observed after the booster dose. These data support the use of VLA2001 in booster programmes in ChadOx1-S primed groups.
Keywords: Booster; COVID-19; Coronavirus; Delta; Inactivated vaccine; Neutralizing antibody; Omicron; S protein binding IgG antibody; SARS-CoV-2; Variants of concern.
Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest AF is a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation, until December 2022 was chair of the WHO European Technical Advisory Group of Experts on Immunisation, remains a member of the WHO Working Group on COVID19 vaccines and is an investigator or provides consulting advice on clinical trials and studies of COVID-19 vaccines produced by AstraZeneca, Janssen, Valneva, Pfizer, Moderna, and Sanofi, and of other vaccines from these and other manufacturers, including GlaxoSmithKline. He receives no personal remuneration or benefits for any of the former work but also undertakes paid consultancy for Bionet Asia, the Helmsley Charitable Trust, Hillevax, Imophoron, Janssen, RQ Bio and VB Vaccines. HD, KD, AL, SE-L, RH, JCJ, MK, GM, BQ, PW and CT are employees of Valneva Austria GmbH. RL has received grants or worked on clinical trials funded by Valneva, Moderna, Janssen, and AstraZeneca and has received support for meeting attendance, lectures, or writing from AstraZeneca. Pseudovirus neutralisation assays conducted by SP and MH were performed as contract research.
Similar articles
-
Immunogenicity and safety of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001) compared with the adenoviral vector vaccine ChAdOx1-S in adults in the UK (COV-COMPARE): interim analysis of a randomised, controlled, phase 3, immunobridging trial.Lancet Infect Dis. 2022 Dec;22(12):1716-1727. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00502-3. Epub 2022 Sep 5. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022. PMID: 36075233 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Safety and immunogenicity of the inactivated whole-virus adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccine VLA2001: A randomized, dose escalation, double-blind phase 1/2 clinical trial in healthy adults.J Infect. 2022 Sep;85(3):306-317. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2022.06.009. Epub 2022 Jun 16. J Infect. 2022. PMID: 35718205 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Immunogenicity and safety in healthy adults of full dose versus half doses of COVID-19 vaccine (ChAdOx1-S or BNT162b2) or full-dose CoronaVac administered as a booster dose after priming with CoronaVac: a randomised, observer-masked, controlled trial in Indonesia.Lancet Infect Dis. 2023 May;23(5):545-555. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00800-3. Epub 2023 Jan 11. Lancet Infect Dis. 2023. PMID: 36640798 Clinical Trial.
-
Real-world effectiveness and factors associated with effectiveness of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines: a systematic review and meta-regression analysis.BMC Med. 2023 Apr 27;21(1):160. doi: 10.1186/s12916-023-02861-3. BMC Med. 2023. PMID: 37106390 Free PMC article.
-
Facing the Omicron variant-how well do vaccines protect against mild and severe COVID-19? Third interim analysis of a living systematic review.Front Immunol. 2022 Aug 24;13:940562. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.940562. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36091023 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Long-Term Immunogenicity and Safety of a Homologous Third Dose Booster Vaccination with TURKOVAC: Phase 2 Clinical Study Findings with 32-Week Post-Booster Follow-Up.Vaccines (Basel). 2024 Jan 29;12(2):140. doi: 10.3390/vaccines12020140. Vaccines (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38400124 Free PMC article.
-
COVID-19 Vaccines: Where Did We Stand at the End of 2023?Viruses. 2024 Jan 29;16(2):203. doi: 10.3390/v16020203. Viruses. 2024. PMID: 38399979 Free PMC article. Review.
-
COVID-19 vaccine updates for people under different conditions.Sci China Life Sci. 2024 Nov;67(11):2323-2343. doi: 10.1007/s11427-024-2643-1. Epub 2024 Jul 29. Sci China Life Sci. 2024. PMID: 39083202 Review.
-
Vaccine development against tuberculosis before and after Covid-19.Front Immunol. 2023 Nov 15;14:1273938. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1273938. eCollection 2023. Front Immunol. 2023. PMID: 38035095 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Homologous and Heterologous Booster in COVID-19 Vaccination.Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Dec 22;17(12):1734. doi: 10.3390/ph17121734. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39770576 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Supplementary concepts
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous