Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Aug;58(4):3074-3097.
doi: 10.1111/ejn.16073. Epub 2023 Jul 5.

The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability: A systematic review of nonsignificant findings

Gabrielle Klees-Themens  1 , Hugo Théoret  1
Affiliations
Review

The effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on corticospinal excitability: A systematic review of nonsignificant findings

Gabrielle Klees-Themens et al. Eur J Neurosci. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique that can modulate brain activity through the application of low-intensity electrical currents. Based on its reported effects on corticospinal excitability (CSE), tDCS has been used to study cognition in healthy individuals and reduce symptoms in a variety of clinical conditions. Despite its increasing popularity as a research and clinical tool, high interindividual variability has been reported in the response to protocols using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess tDCS-induced changes in CSE leading to several nonsignificant findings. In this systematic review, studies that reported no significant modulation of CSE following tDCS were identified from PubMed and Embase (Ovid) databases. Forty-three articles were identified where demographic, TMS and tDCS parameters were extracted. Overall, stimulation parameters, CSE measurements and participant characteristics were similar to those described in studies reporting positive results and were likewise heterogeneous between studies. Small sample sizes and inadequate blinding were notable features of the reviewed studies. This systematic review suggests that studies reporting nonsignificant findings do not markedly differ from those reporting significant modulation of CSE.

Keywords: corticospinal excitability; non-invasive brain stimulation; systematic review; tDCS.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. Agboada, D., Mosayebi Samani, M., Jamil, A., Kuo, M. F., & Nitsche, M. A. (2019). Expanding the parameter space of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 18185. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-54621-0
    1. Ambrus, G. G., Al-Moyed, H., Chaieb, L., Sarp, L., Antal, A., & Paulus, W. (2012). The fade-in-short stimulation-fade out approach to sham tDCS-reliable at 1 mA for naive and experienced subjects, but not investigators. Brain Stimulation, 5(4), 499-504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2011.12.001
    1. Angius, L., Pageaux, B., Hopker, J., Marcora, S. M., & Mauger, A. R. (2016). Transcranial direct current stimulation improves isometric time to exhaustion of the knee extensors. Neuroscience, 339, 363-375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2016.10.028
    1. Antal, A., Terney, D., Poreisz, C., & Paulus, W. (2007). Towards unravelling task-related modulations of neuroplastic changes induced in the human motor cortex. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 26(9), 2687-2691. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05896.x
    1. Ardolino, G., Bossi, B., Barbieri, S., & Priori, A. (2005). Non-synaptic mechanisms underlie the after-effects of cathodal transcutaneous direct current stimulation of the human brain. The Journal of Physiology, 568(Pt 2), 653-663. https://doi.org/10.1113/jphysiol.2005.088310

LinkOut - more resources