Telemedicine Use Decreases the Carbon Footprint of the Bariatric Surgery Preoperative Evaluation
- PMID: 37407773
- DOI: 10.1007/s11695-023-06721-0
Telemedicine Use Decreases the Carbon Footprint of the Bariatric Surgery Preoperative Evaluation
Abstract
Background: Healthcare-associated activity accounts for 10% of the United States' carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions. Using telemedicine for bariatric surgery evaluations decreases emissions and reduces patient burden during the multiple required interdisciplinary visits. After adopting telemedicine during COVID, our clinic continues to utilize telemedicine for preoperative bariatric evaluations. We evaluated the reduced environmental impact associated with this practice.
Methods: A retrospective review of all new evaluations for vertical sleeve gastrectomy (SG) or Roux-en Y gastric bypass (RYGB) from 2019 and 2021 was conducted. The 2019 year represents pre-pandemic, in-person evaluations and 2021 represents telemedicine evaluations during the COVID pandemic. Carbon emissions were calculated using the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA's) validated formula of 404g CO2 per car-mile. Preoperative evaluation time was calculated from the initial clinic visit to the operation date.
Results: There were 51 patients in the 2019 cohort and 55 patients in the 2021 cohort. In the 2019 in-person cohort, there was significantly more kg of estimated CO2 emitted (10,225 vs. 2011.4, p<.001) compared to the 2021 cohort. For time required to complete the preoperative workup, there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (162 days vs. 193 days, p=.226). The attrition rate was lower in the 2021 cohort (22.22% v. 35.9%, p<.001).
Conclusions: Implementation of telemedicine for bariatric preoperative evaluations reduced patient travel, carbon emissions, and improved attrition rate. We encourage bariatric providers to use telemedicine as we believe this eases patient burdens and, with wider adoption, could significantly reduce our carbon footprint.
Keywords: Attrition rate; Bariatric surgery; Carbon footprint; Telemedicine.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
The environmental impact of surgical telemedicine: life cycle assessment of virtual vs. in-person preoperative evaluations for benign foregut disease.Surg Endosc. 2023 Jul;37(7):5696-5702. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10131-9. Epub 2023 May 26. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37237107 Free PMC article.
-
Thirty-day outcomes of sleeve gastrectomy versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: first report based on Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018 May;14(5):545-551. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2018.01.011. Epub 2018 Jan 13. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018. PMID: 29551470
-
Comparison of Short-term Safety of One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass to Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Sleeve Gastrectomy in the United States: 341 cases from MBSAQIP-accredited Centers.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022 Mar;18(3):326-334. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2021.11.009. Epub 2021 Nov 13. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2022. PMID: 34896012
-
Outcomes of same-day discharge sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023 Mar;19(3):238-249. doi: 10.1016/j.soard.2022.09.004. Epub 2022 Sep 11. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2023. PMID: 36209031
-
Adverse perinatal outcomes after Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs. Sleeve Gastrectomy: a systematic review.BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023 Aug 2;23(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05515-7. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023. PMID: 37532995 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Aligning With the Goals of the Planetary Health Concept Regarding Ecological Sustainability and Digital Health: Scoping Review.J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 28;27:e71795. doi: 10.2196/71795. J Med Internet Res. 2025. PMID: 40435494 Free PMC article.
-
Safety Outcomes in Same-Day Discharge Anastomotic Metabolic/Bariatric Surgery vs Regular Overnight Discharge Protocol: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Obes Surg. 2025 Jul;35(7):2567-2577. doi: 10.1007/s11695-025-07885-7. Epub 2025 May 20. Obes Surg. 2025. PMID: 40392475 Review.
-
Large language models and generative AI in telehealth: a responsible use lens.J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024 Sep 1;31(9):2125-2136. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocae035. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2024. PMID: 38441296 Free PMC article. Review.
-
An Innovative Assessment Framework for Remote Care in Orthopedics.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Mar 26;13(7):736. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13070736. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40218034 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Weiner JP, Bandeian S, Hatef E, et al. In-person and telehealth ambulatory contacts and costs in a large US insured cohort before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(3):e212618. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.2618 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Zhu J, Lois AW, Gitonga B, et al. The impact of socioeconomic status on telemedicine utilization during the COVID-19 pandemic among surgical clinics at an academic tertiary care center. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(12)):9304–12. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09186-x . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Chung JW, Meltzer DO. Estimate of the carbon footprint of the US health care sector. JAMA. 2009;302(18):1970–2. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2009.1610 . - DOI - PubMed
-
- Eckelman MJ, Sherman J. Environmental Impacts of the U.S. Health Care System and Effects on Public Health. PLoS One. 2016;11(6):e0157014. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0157014 . - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Malik A, Lenzen M, McAlister S, et al. The carbon footprint of Australian health care. Lancet Planet Health. 2018;2(1):e27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2542-5196(17)30180-8 . - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials