Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 5;24(1):47.
doi: 10.1186/s12910-023-00925-w.

Biobanking and consenting to research: a qualitative thematic analysis of young people's perspectives in the North East of England

Fabian J S van der Velden #  1   2 , Emma Lim #  1   3   4 , Lily Gills  5 , Jasmin Broadey  6 , Louise Hayes  3 , Eve Roberts  4 , Jack Courtney  5 , Joanne Ball  5 , Jethro Herberg  7 , Rachel Galassini  7 , Marieke Emonts  8   9 ; DIAMONDS consortium
Collaborators, Affiliations

Biobanking and consenting to research: a qualitative thematic analysis of young people's perspectives in the North East of England

Fabian J S van der Velden et al. BMC Med Ethics. .

Abstract

Background: Biobanking biospecimens and consent are common practice in paediatric research. We need to explore children and young people's (CYP) knowledge and perspectives around the use of and consent to biobanking. This will ensure meaningful informed consent can be obtained and improve current consent procedures.

Methods: We designed a survey, in co-production with CYP, collecting demographic data, views on biobanking, and consent using three scenarios: 1) prospective consent, 2) deferred consent, and 3) reconsent and assent at age of capacity. The survey was disseminated via the Young Person's Advisory Group North England (YPAGne) and participating CYP's secondary schools. Data were analysed using a qualitative thematic approach by three independent reviewers (including CYP) to identify common themes. Data triangulation occurred independently by a fourth reviewer.

Results: One hundred two CYP completed the survey. Most were between 16-18 years (63.7%, N = 65) and female (66.7%, N = 68). 72.3% had no prior knowledge of biobanking (N = 73). Acceptability of prospective consent for biobanking was high (91.2%, N = 93) with common themes: 'altruism', 'potential benefits outweigh individual risk', 'frugality', and '(in)convenience'. Deferred consent was also deemed acceptable in the large majority (84.3%, N = 86), with common themes: 'altruism', 'body integrity' and 'sample frugality'. 76.5% preferred to reconsent when cognitively mature enough to give assent (N = 78), even if parental consent was previously in place. 79.2% wanted to be informed if their biobanked biospecimen is reused (N = 80).

Conclusion: Prospective and deferred consent acceptability for biobanking is high among CYP in the UK. Altruism, frugality, body integrity, and privacy are the most important themes. Clear communication and justification are paramount to obtain consent. Any CYP with capacity should be part of the consenting procedure, if possible.

Keywords: Assent; Biobank; Children and young people; Consent; Paediatrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Acceptability (%) for sample donation by sample type
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Raynor P, Born in Bradford Collaborative G Born in Bradford, a cohort study of babies born in Bradford, and their parents: protocol for the recruitment phase. BMC Public Health. 2008;8:327. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-327. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jaddoe VW, Mackenbach JP, Moll HA, Steegers EA, Tiemeier H, Verhulst FC, et al. The generation R Study: design and cohort profile. Eur J Epidemiol. 2006;21(6):475–484. doi: 10.1007/s10654-006-9022-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Zielhuis GA. Biobanking for epidemiology. Public Health. 2012;126(3):214–216. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2011.12.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hens K, Levesque E, Dierickx K. Children and biobanks: a review of the ethical and legal discussion. Hum Genet. 2011;130(3):403–413. doi: 10.1007/s00439-011-1031-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hens K, Cassiman JJ, Nys H, Dierickx K. Children, biobanks and the scope of parental consent. Eur J Hum Genet. 2011;19(7):735–739. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.29. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources