It is time to implement molecular classification in endometrial cancer
- PMID: 37410149
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07128-z
It is time to implement molecular classification in endometrial cancer
Abstract
A huge effort has been done in redefining endometrial cancer (EC) risk classes in the last decade. However, known prognostic factors (FIGO staging and grading, biomolecular classification and ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classes stratification) are not able to predict outcomes and especially recurrences. Biomolecular classification has helped in re-classifying patients for a more appropriate adjuvant treatment and clinical studies suggest that currently used molecular classification improves the risk assessment of women with EC, however, it does not clearly explain differences in recurrence profiles. Furthermore, a lack of evidence appears in EC guidelines. Here, we summarize the main concepts why molecular classification is not enough in the management of endometrial cancer, by highlighting some promising innovative examples in scientific literature studies with a clinical potential significant impact.
Keywords: EC biomolecular classification; EC prognosis prediction; EC recurrence prediction; EC risk stratification; Endometrial cancer.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
High risk endometrial cancer: Clues towards a revision of the therapeutic paradigm.J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019 Dec;48(10):863-871. doi: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2019.06.003. Epub 2019 Jun 5. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. 2019. PMID: 31176047 Review.
-
Patterns of recurrence and outcomes in surgically treated women with endometrial cancer according to ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO Consensus Conference risk groups: Results from the FRANCOGYN study Group.Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Jan;144(1):107-112. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.025. Epub 2016 Oct 25. Gynecol Oncol. 2017. PMID: 27789083
-
Pattern of recurrence in patients with endometrial cancer: A retrospective study.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020 Sep;46(9):1697-1702. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2020.03.203. Epub 2020 Mar 13. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020. PMID: 32204935
-
Immunohistochemical biomarkers are prognostic relevant in addition to the ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classification in endometrial cancer.Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Jun;161(3):787-794. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.03.031. Epub 2021 Apr 12. Gynecol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 33858677
-
Prognostic value of myometrial invasion and TCGA groups of endometrial carcinoma.Gynecol Oncol. 2021 Aug;162(2):401-406. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.05.029. Epub 2021 Jun 1. Gynecol Oncol. 2021. PMID: 34088515
Cited by
-
Insights into MLH1 Methylation in Endometrial Adenocarcinoma through Pyrosequencing Analysis: A Retrospective Observational Study.Cancers (Basel). 2024 Jun 1;16(11):2119. doi: 10.3390/cancers16112119. Cancers (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38893238 Free PMC article.
-
First-degree family history of cancers in patients with stage I endometrial carcinoma. Prevalence and prognostic impact.Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Nov;310(5):2595-2602. doi: 10.1007/s00404-024-07728-3. Epub 2024 Sep 26. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024. PMID: 39327297
References
-
- Fremond S, Koelzer VH, Horeweg N, Bosse T (2022) The evolving role of morphology in endometrial cancer diagnostics: From histopathology and molecular testing towards integrative data analysis by deep learning. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.928977 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Njoku K, Barr CE, Crosbie EJ (2022) Current and emerging prognostic biomarkers in endometrial cancer. Front Oncol 12:1682 - DOI
-
- Colombo, N. et al (2013) Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol, 24 Suppl 6
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources