It is time to implement molecular classification in endometrial cancer
- PMID: 37410149
- DOI: 10.1007/s00404-023-07128-z
It is time to implement molecular classification in endometrial cancer
Abstract
A huge effort has been done in redefining endometrial cancer (EC) risk classes in the last decade. However, known prognostic factors (FIGO staging and grading, biomolecular classification and ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO risk classes stratification) are not able to predict outcomes and especially recurrences. Biomolecular classification has helped in re-classifying patients for a more appropriate adjuvant treatment and clinical studies suggest that currently used molecular classification improves the risk assessment of women with EC, however, it does not clearly explain differences in recurrence profiles. Furthermore, a lack of evidence appears in EC guidelines. Here, we summarize the main concepts why molecular classification is not enough in the management of endometrial cancer, by highlighting some promising innovative examples in scientific literature studies with a clinical potential significant impact.
Keywords: EC biomolecular classification; EC prognosis prediction; EC recurrence prediction; EC risk stratification; Endometrial cancer.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Fremond S, Koelzer VH, Horeweg N, Bosse T (2022) The evolving role of morphology in endometrial cancer diagnostics: From histopathology and molecular testing towards integrative data analysis by deep learning. Front Oncol. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.928977 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Njoku K, Barr CE, Crosbie EJ (2022) Current and emerging prognostic biomarkers in endometrial cancer. Front Oncol 12:1682 - DOI
-
- Colombo, N. et al (2013) Endometrial cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol, 24 Suppl 6
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
