Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Observational Study
. 2024 Jun;25(4):563-578.
doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01604-8. Epub 2023 Jul 6.

Braving the waves: exploring capability well-being patterns in seven European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

Affiliations
Observational Study

Braving the waves: exploring capability well-being patterns in seven European countries during the COVID-19 pandemic

Sebastian Himmler et al. Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Jun.

Erratum in

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic considerably impacted the lives of European citizens. This study aims to provide a nuanced picture of well-being patterns during the pandemic across Europe with a special focus on relevant socio-economic sub-groups. This observational study uses data from a repeated, cross-sectional, representative population survey with nine waves of data from seven European countries from April 2020 to January 2022. The analysis sample contains a total of 25,062 individuals providing 64,303 observations. Well-being is measured using the ICECAP-A, a multi-dimensional instrument for approximating capability well-being. Average levels of ICECAP-A index values and sub-dimension scores were calculated across waves, countries, and relevant sub-groups. In a fixed effects regression framework, associations of capability well-being with COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and the stringency of the imposed lockdown measures were estimated. Denmark, the Netherlands, and France experienced a U-shaped pattern in well-being (lowest point in winter 2020/21), while well-being in the UK, Germany, Portugal, and Italy followed an M-shape, with increases after April 2020, a drop in winter 2020, a recovery in the summer of 2021, and a decline in winter 2021. However, observed average well-being reductions were generally small. The largest declines were found in the well-being dimensions attachment and enjoyment and among individuals with a younger age, a financially unstable situation, and lower health. COVID-19 mortality was consistently negatively associated with capability well-being and its sub-dimensions, while stringency and incidence rate were generally not significantly associated with well-being. Further investigation is needed to understand underlying mechanisms of presented patterns.

Keywords: COVID-19; Capability well-being; ICECAP-A; Pandemic; Well-being.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; no financial relationships with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work in the previous 3 years; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Mean incidence rate, mortality rate, and 14-day stringency index across the seven countries and the nine waves of data collected from April 2020 to September 2021. Incidence rate capped at 1000 (black)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Mean ICECAP-A utility score across countries and waves of data collection. The utility score ranges from 0 (no capabilities) to 1 (full capabilities) and was calculated using weights derived for the UK [32]. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals. Mortality data were extracted from Our World in Data [24]
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean ICECAP-A dimension scores across countries and waves of data collection. ICECAP-A dimension scores range from 1 (worst) to 4 (best). Number of observations per cell ~ 1000
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Mean ICECAP-A utility score across countries and waves of data collection, by age groups. The utility score ranges from 0 to 1 and was calculated using weights derived for the UK [32]. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Mean ICECAP-A utility score across countries and waves of data collection, by gender. The utility score ranges from 0 to 1 and was calculated using weights derived for the UK [32]. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Mean ICECAP-A utility score across countries and waves of data collection, by education level. Highly educated corresponds to some form of tertiary education (see Appendix 1). The utility score ranges from 0 to 1 and was calculated using weights derived for the UK [32]. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
Mean ICECAP-A utility score across countries and waves of data collection, by health status using EQ-5D sum score. No health problems (5), some health problems (6–9), more severe health problems (10 +) on a theoretical range of 5 (no problems) to 25 (extreme problems on all dimensions). The utility score ranges from 0 to 1 and was calculated using weights derived for the UK [32]. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
Mean ICECAP-A utility score across countries and waves of data collection, by financial security. “Insecure” defined as having some or great difficulties with making ends meet. The utility score ranges from 0 to 1 and was calculated using weights derived for the UK [32]. Shaded areas represent 95% confidence intervals

Similar articles

References

    1. Jabłońska K, Aballéa S, Toumi M. The real-life impact of vaccination on COVID-19 mortality in Europe and Israel. Public Health. 2021;198:230–237. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.07.037. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hale, T., Anania, J., Angrist, N., Boby, T., Cameron-Blake, E., Folco, M. Di, Ellen, L., Goldszmidt, R., Hallas, L., KIra, B., Luciano, M., Majumadar, S., Nagesh, R., Petherick, A., Phillips, T., Tatlow, H., Webster, S., Wood, A., Zhang, Y.: Variation in government responses to COVID-19, Version 12.0. (2021)
    1. Vindegaard N, Benros ME. COVID-19 pandemic and mental health consequences: systematic review of the current evidence. Brain. Behav. Immun. 2020;89:531–542. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.048. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hajek A, Sabat I, Neumann-Böhme S, Schreyögg J, Barros PP, Stargardt T, König HH. Prevalence and determinants of probable depression and anxiety during the COVID-19 pandemic in seven countries: longitudinal evidence from the European COvid Survey (ECOS) J. Affect. Disord. 2022;299:517–524. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.029. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Long D, Bonsel GJ, Lubetkin EI, Janssen MF, Haagsma JA. Anxiety, depression, and social connectedness among the general population of eight countries during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arch. Public Heal. 2022;80:237. doi: 10.1186/s13690-022-00990-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types