Factors Influencing the Sharing of Personal Health Data Based on the Integrated Theory of Privacy Calculus and Theory of Planned Behaviors Framework: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study of Chinese Patients in the Yangtze River Delta
- PMID: 37410526
- PMCID: PMC10359915
- DOI: 10.2196/46562
Factors Influencing the Sharing of Personal Health Data Based on the Integrated Theory of Privacy Calculus and Theory of Planned Behaviors Framework: Results of a Cross-Sectional Study of Chinese Patients in the Yangtze River Delta
Abstract
Background: The health care system in China is fragmented, and the distribution of high-quality resources remains uneven and irrational. Information sharing is essential to the development of an integrated health care system and maximizing its benefits. Nevertheless, data sharing raises concerns regarding the privacy and confidentiality of personal health information, which affect the willingness of patients to share information.
Objective: This study aims to investigate patients' willingness to share personal health data at different levels of maternal and child specialized hospitals in China, to propose and test a conceptual model to identify key influencing factors, and to provide countermeasures and suggestions to improve the level of data sharing.
Methods: A research framework based on the Theory of Privacy Calculus and the Theory of Planned Behavior was developed and empirically tested through a cross-sectional field survey from September 2022 to October 2022 in the Yangtze River Delta region, China. A 33-item measurement instrument was developed. Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and logistic regression analyses were conducted to characterize the willingness of sharing personal health data and differences by sociodemographic factors. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the reliability and validity of the measurement as well as to test the research hypotheses. The STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) checklist for cross-sectional studies was applied for reporting results.
Results: The empirical framework had a good fit with the chi-square/degree of freedom (χ2/df)=2.637, root-mean-square residual=0.032, root-mean-square error of approximation=0.048, goodness-of-fit index=0.950, and normed fit index=0.955. A total of 2060 completed questionnaires were received (response rate: 2060/2400, 85.83%). Moral motive (β=.803, P<.001), perceived benefit (β=.123, P=.04), and perceived effectiveness of government regulation (β=.110, P=.001) had a significantly positive association with sharing willingness, while perceived risk (β=-.143, P<.001) had a significant negative impact, with moral motive having the greatest impact. The estimated model explained 90.5% of the variance in sharing willingness.
Conclusions: This study contributes to the literature on personal health data sharing by integrating the Theory of Privacy Calculus and the Theory of Planned Behavior. Most Chinese patients are willing to share their personal health data, which is primarily motivated by moral concerns to improve public health and assist in the diagnosis and treatment of illnesses. Patients with no prior experience with personal information disclosure and those who have tertiary hospital visits were more likely to share their health data. Practical guidelines are provided to health policy makers and health care practitioners to encourage patients to share their personal health information.
Keywords: Theory of Planned Behavior; data sharing; influencing factor; personal health data; privacy calculus.
©Jingjin Shi, Rui Yuan, Xueming Yan, Miao Wang, Jun Qiu, Xinhua Ji, Guangjun Yu. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (https://www.jmir.org), 06.07.2023.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of Interest: None declared.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Do personal health concerns and trust in healthcare providers mitigate privacy concerns? Effects on patients' intention to share personal health data on electronic health records.Soc Sci Med. 2021 Aug;283:114146. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114146. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Soc Sci Med. 2021. PMID: 34242891
-
Putting the Focus Back on the Patient: How Privacy Concerns Affect Personal Health Information Sharing Intentions.J Med Internet Res. 2017 Sep 13;19(9):e169. doi: 10.2196/jmir.6877. J Med Internet Res. 2017. PMID: 28903895 Free PMC article.
-
Sharing medical data for health research: the early personal health record experience.J Med Internet Res. 2010 May 25;12(2):e14. doi: 10.2196/jmir.1356. J Med Internet Res. 2010. PMID: 20501431 Free PMC article.
-
Findings from 2017 on Consumer Health Informatics and Education: Health Data Access and Sharing.Yearb Med Inform. 2018 Aug;27(1):163-169. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1641218. Epub 2018 Aug 29. Yearb Med Inform. 2018. PMID: 30157519 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Patient Perspectives and Preferences for Consent in the Digital Health Context: State-of-the-art Literature Review.J Med Internet Res. 2023 Feb 10;25:e42507. doi: 10.2196/42507. J Med Internet Res. 2023. PMID: 36763409 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Worldwide willingness to share health data high but privacy, consent and transparency paramount, a meta-analysis.NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Aug 23;8(1):540. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-01868-9. NPJ Digit Med. 2025. PMID: 40849400 Free PMC article.
-
Influence of personality traits on generation Z consumers' click-through intentions towards personalized advertisements: A mixed-methods study.Heliyon. 2024 Jul 17;10(15):e34559. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e34559. eCollection 2024 Aug 15. Heliyon. 2024. PMID: 39144948 Free PMC article.
-
Public perceptions and engagement in mHealth: a European survey on attitudes toward health apps use and data sharing.Eur J Public Health. 2025 Jun 1;35(3):401-406. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckaf036. Eur J Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40249875 Free PMC article.
-
Equity and efficiency of health resource allocation in the Chengdu-Chongqing Economic Circle of China.Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 27;12:1369568. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1369568. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39257950 Free PMC article.
-
Determinants of consent for electronic health information exchange: an observational retrospective study.Health Res Policy Syst. 2025 Aug 7;23(1):103. doi: 10.1186/s12961-025-01377-x. Health Res Policy Syst. 2025. PMID: 40775343 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Dinev T, Hart P. An Extended Privacy Calculus Model for E-Commerce Transactions. Information Systems Research. 2006 Mar;17(1):61–80. doi: 10.1287/isre.1060.0080. - DOI
-
- Awad. Krishnan The Personalization Privacy Paradox: An Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to Be Profiled Online for Personalization. MIS Quarterly. 2006;30(1):13–28. doi: 10.2307/25148715. - DOI
-
- Ozturk AB, Nusair K, Okumus F, Singh D. Understanding mobile hotel booking loyalty: an integration of privacy calculus theory and trust-risk framework. Inf Syst Front. 2017 Feb 3;19(4):753–767. doi: 10.1007/s10796-017-9736-4. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous