The 8-item NHANES pocket smell test®: Normative data
- PMID: 37410621
- PMCID: PMC10770295
- DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2224480
The 8-item NHANES pocket smell test®: Normative data
Abstract
This study provides normative data useful for interpreting scores from the Pocket Smell Test® (PST®), a brief "scratch & sniff" neuropsychological olfactory screening test comprised of 8 items from the 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT®). We combined 3,485 PST® scores from the 2013 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) of persons 40 years of age and older with equivalent PST® items extracted from an UPSIT® database of 3,900 persons ranging in age from 5 to 99 years. Decade-related age- and gender-adjusted percentile normative data were established across the entire age spectrum. Cut-points for defining clinically useful categories of anosmia, probable microsmia, and normosmia were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. An age-related decline in test scores was evident for both sexes after the age of 40 years, with women outperforming men. Based on the ROC analyses, subjects scoring 3 or less (AUC = 0.81) defines anosmia. Regardless of sex, a score of 7 or 8 on the N-PST® signifies normal function (AUC of 0.71). Probable microsmia is classified as scores extending from 3 to 6. These data provide an accurate means for interpreting PST® scores within a number of clinical and applied settings.
Keywords: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES); UPSIT®; olfaction; pocket smell test®; psychophysics.
Similar articles
-
Utility of a three-item smell identification test in detecting olfactory dysfunction.Laryngoscope. 2005 Dec;115(12):2209-12. doi: 10.1097/01.mlg.0000183194.17484.bb. Laryngoscope. 2005. PMID: 16369168
-
Screening performance of abbreviated versions of the UPSIT smell test.J Neurol. 2019 Aug;266(8):1897-1906. doi: 10.1007/s00415-019-09340-x. Epub 2019 May 3. J Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31053960 Free PMC article.
-
Development of normative data for the Brazilian adaptation of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test.Chem Senses. 2015 Feb;40(2):141-9. doi: 10.1093/chemse/bju068. Epub 2014 Dec 29. Chem Senses. 2015. PMID: 25547105
-
Development of Taiwan Smell Identification Test: a quick office-based smell screening test for Taiwanese.Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015 Mar-Apr;29(2):e50-4. doi: 10.2500/ajra.2015.29.4174. Am J Rhinol Allergy. 2015. PMID: 25785743
-
Development and Validation of a Novel At-home Smell Assessment.JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Mar 1;148(3):252-258. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2021.3994. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022. PMID: 35024772 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Association between olfactory dysfunction and gustatory dysfunction: evidence from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.Front Public Health. 2025 Feb 13;13:1519290. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1519290. eCollection 2025. Front Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40017542 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Cao Z, Luo Z, Huang X, Pinto JM, Simonsick EM, Shiroma EJ, & Chen H. (2020). Self-reported versus objectively assessed olfaction and Parkinson’s disease risk. J Parkinsons Dis, 10, 1789–95. - PubMed
-
- Devanand DP, Tabert MH, Pelton GH, Zamora D, Vignier M, Goodkind M, Bell K, Stern Y, & Doty RP (2004). Olfactory identification deficits predict conversion to AD in cognitively impaired patients without dementia. Neurobiology of Aging, 25, S138–S38.
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical