Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul-Aug;32(4):922-927.
doi: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2224480. Epub 2023 Jul 6.

The 8-item NHANES pocket smell test®: Normative data

Affiliations

The 8-item NHANES pocket smell test®: Normative data

Aretha On et al. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2025 Jul-Aug.

Abstract

This study provides normative data useful for interpreting scores from the Pocket Smell Test® (PST®), a brief "scratch & sniff" neuropsychological olfactory screening test comprised of 8 items from the 40-item University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT®). We combined 3,485 PST® scores from the 2013 to 2014 National Health and Nutrition Survey (NHANES) of persons 40 years of age and older with equivalent PST® items extracted from an UPSIT® database of 3,900 persons ranging in age from 5 to 99 years. Decade-related age- and gender-adjusted percentile normative data were established across the entire age spectrum. Cut-points for defining clinically useful categories of anosmia, probable microsmia, and normosmia were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. An age-related decline in test scores was evident for both sexes after the age of 40 years, with women outperforming men. Based on the ROC analyses, subjects scoring 3 or less (AUC = 0.81) defines anosmia. Regardless of sex, a score of 7 or 8 on the N-PST® signifies normal function (AUC of 0.71). Probable microsmia is classified as scores extending from 3 to 6. These data provide an accurate means for interpreting PST® scores within a number of clinical and applied settings.

Keywords: National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES); UPSIT®; olfaction; pocket smell test®; psychophysics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bhutani S, & McClain AC (2022). Body fat moderates the association of olfactory dysfunction with dietary intake in U.S. middle-aged and older adults: A cross-sectional analysis of NHANES 2013–2014. Nutrients, 14(15):3178. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brumm MC, Pierz KA, Lafontant D-E, Caspell-Garcia C, Coffey CS, Siderowf A, & Marek K. (2023). Updated percentiles for the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test in adults 50 years of age and older. Neurology, 100:e1691–e1701. doi.10.1212/WNL.0000000000207077. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cao Z, Luo Z, Huang X, Pinto JM, Simonsick EM, Shiroma EJ, & Chen H. (2020). Self-reported versus objectively assessed olfaction and Parkinson’s disease risk. J Parkinsons Dis, 10, 1789–95. - PubMed
    1. Devanand DP, Lee S, Manly J, Andrews H, Schupf N, Masurkar A, Stern Y, Mayeux R, & Doty RL (2015). Olfactory identification deficits and increased mortality in the community. Annals of Neurology, 78, 401–11. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Devanand DP, Tabert MH, Pelton GH, Zamora D, Vignier M, Goodkind M, Bell K, Stern Y, & Doty RP (2004). Olfactory identification deficits predict conversion to AD in cognitively impaired patients without dementia. Neurobiology of Aging, 25, S138–S38.

LinkOut - more resources