Practical guidance to reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiology applying ultra low-dose protocols: a European Heart Rhythm Association review
- PMID: 37410906
- PMCID: PMC10365833
- DOI: 10.1093/europace/euad191
Practical guidance to reduce radiation exposure in electrophysiology applying ultra low-dose protocols: a European Heart Rhythm Association review
Abstract
Interventional electrophysiology offers a great variety of treatment options to patients suffering from symptomatic cardiac arrhythmia. Catheter ablation of supraventricular and ventricular tachycardia has globally evolved a cornerstone in modern arrhythmia management. Complex interventional electrophysiological procedures engaging multiple ablation tools have been developed over the past decades. Fluoroscopy enabled interventional electrophysiologist throughout the years to gain profound knowledge on intracardiac anatomy and catheter movement inside the cardiac cavities and hence develop specific ablation approaches. However, the application of X-ray technologies imposes serious health risks to patients and operators. To reduce the use of fluoroscopy during interventional electrophysiological procedures to the possibly lowest degree and to establish an optimal protection of patients and operators in cases of fluoroscopy is the main goal of modern radiation management. The present manuscript gives an overview of possible strategies of fluoroscopy reduction and specific radiation protection strategies.
Keywords: Radiation awareness; Radiation dosage reduction; Radiation protection; Ultra low-dose protocols.
© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: P.S. is a member of the Advisory Board of Abbott, Biosense Webster, Boston Scientific, and Medtronic. V.S. has no conflicts of interest to declare. M.A. is a consultant for Biosense Webster and Boston Scientific, clinical proctor for Medtronic, and has received educational grants from Abbott. R.T. is a consultant for Biosense Webster, Abbott, and Boston Scientific, and a speaker for Medtronic. H.L. has no conflicts of interest to declare. A.B. is a consultant for Biotronik, Abbott, and Biosense Webster, clinical proctor for Biotronik and Abbott, and has received educational grants from Boston Scientific.
Figures













Similar articles
-
X-Ray Exposure in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Retrospective Analysis in 8150 Patients Over 7 Years of Activity in a Modern, Large-Volume Laboratory.J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 22;7(11):e008233. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.008233. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018. PMID: 29789334 Free PMC article.
-
Feasibility of zero or near zero fluoroscopy during catheter ablation procedures.Cardiol J. 2019;26(3):226-232. doi: 10.5603/CJ.a2018.0029. Epub 2018 Apr 3. Cardiol J. 2019. PMID: 29611170 Free PMC article.
-
Benefits of electroanatomic ablation of conventional cardiac arrhytmias: from fluoroscopy to zero X-ray mapping.Minerva Cardioangiol. 2018 Feb;66(1):49-62. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4725.17.04478-4. Epub 2017 Aug 31. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2018. PMID: 28862408 Review.
-
Radiation safety protocol using real-time dose reporting reduces patient exposure in pediatric electrophysiology procedures.Pediatr Cardiol. 2014 Oct;35(7):1116-23. doi: 10.1007/s00246-014-0904-8. Epub 2014 May 7. Pediatr Cardiol. 2014. PMID: 24801673
-
Comprehensive strategies to minimize radiation exposure during Interventional electrophysiology procedures: state-of-the-art review.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020 Nov;17(11):1183-1192. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2020.1819789. Epub 2020 Dec 27. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2020. PMID: 32885677 Review.
Cited by
-
Adding Electroanatomical Mapping to Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation Improves 1-Year Clinical Outcome and Durability of Pulmonary Vein Isolation: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Feb 6;11(2):57. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11020057. J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024. PMID: 38392271 Free PMC article.
-
Radiation protection: safety measures and knowledge among interventional radiologists- a UK-based analysis of current practices and recommendations for improvement.CVIR Endovasc. 2025 Apr 22;8(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s42155-025-00540-3. CVIR Endovasc. 2025. PMID: 40261505 Free PMC article.
-
Utilization of and perceived need for simulators in clinical electrophysiology: results from an EHRA physician survey.Europace. 2024 Feb 1;26(2):euae037. doi: 10.1093/europace/euae037. Europace. 2024. PMID: 38293821 Free PMC article.
-
2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024 Aug;67(5):921-1072. doi: 10.1007/s10840-024-01771-5. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2024. Corrected and republished in: Heart Rhythm. 2024 Sep;21(9):e31-e149. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.03.017. PMID: 38609733 Corrected and republished.
-
Impact of high-resolution 3D-mapping with micro-electrodes on catheter ablation of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024 Jun 5;53:101435. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcha.2024.101435. eCollection 2024 Aug. Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc. 2024. PMID: 38946712 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Walters TE, Kistler PM, Morton JB, Sparks PB, Halloran K, Kalman JM. Impact of collimation on radiation exposure during interventional electrophysiology. Europace 2012;14:1670–3. - PubMed
-
- Suzuki S, Furui S, Yamakawa T, Isshiki T, Watanabe A, Iino Ret al. . Radiation exposure to patients’ skin during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Europace 2009;11:1683–8.. - PubMed
-
- Rehani MM, Vano E, Ciraj-Bielac O, Kleiman NJ. Radiation and cataract. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2011;147:300–4. - PubMed
-
- Stewart FA, Akleyev AV, Hauer-Jensen M, Hendry JH, Kleiman NJ, Macvittie TJet al. . ICRP statement on tissue reactions and early and late effects of radiation in normal tissues and organs—threshold doses for tissue reactions in a radiation protection context. Ann ICRP 2012;41:1–322. - PubMed