Comparative anaerobic power of men and women
- PMID: 3741284
Comparative anaerobic power of men and women
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the differences in anaerobic power (AnP) between men and women and the contribution of anthropometric variables in accounting for these differences. There were 18 female and 19 male subjects who performed the 30-s Wingate test where power outputs in watts are expressed as mean power (MP, the mean for 30 s) and peak power (PP, the highest 5-s interval). Thigh volume (TV), lean body mass (LBM) and body weight (BW) were used as anthropometric variables. Absolute AnP of men was 35% and 40% higher (p less than 0.001) than that of women for PP and MP, respectively. These differences decreased to 10% and 17% for PP and MP when expressed relative to kg LBM. Anthropometric variables explained less than 50% of the variation in PP and MP for men, while in women, TV accounted for 66% and 71% of the variation in PP and MP, respectively. When the data were combined, TV, BW, and LBM explained 48%, 74%, and 79% of variation in MP and 53%, 71%, and 76% in PP, respectively. These data show that gender differences in indices of AnP are similar to those reported for muscular strength and aerobic power. Additionally, a larger portion of the between gender variation compared to the within gender variation in AnP can be accounted for by anthropometric variables.
Similar articles
-
Upper and lower body anaerobic power: comparison between biathletes and control subjects.Int J Sports Med. 1987 Apr;8(2):94-8. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1025648. Int J Sports Med. 1987. PMID: 3596883
-
Maximal power outputs during the Wingate anaerobic test.Int J Sports Med. 1985 Apr;6(2):82-5. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1025818. Int J Sports Med. 1985. PMID: 4008145 Clinical Trial.
-
Gender-related differences in maximum mechanical power output in short-term activities in children and adolescents.Coll Antropol. 2008 Sep;32(3):821-8. Coll Antropol. 2008. PMID: 18982757
-
The relative power output and relative lean body mass of World and Olympic male and female champions with implications for gender equity.J Sports Sci. 2006 Dec;24(12):1329-39. doi: 10.1080/02640410500520559. J Sports Sci. 2006. PMID: 17101535 Review.
-
The Wingate anaerobic test. An update on methodology, reliability and validity.Sports Med. 1987 Nov-Dec;4(6):381-94. doi: 10.2165/00007256-198704060-00001. Sports Med. 1987. PMID: 3324256 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Muscle fatigue in males and females during multiple-sprint exercise.Sports Med. 2009;39(4):257-78. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200939040-00001. Sports Med. 2009. PMID: 19317516 Review.
-
Sex Differences in the Energy System Contribution during Sprint Exercise in Speed-Power and Endurance Athletes.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 15;13(16):4812. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164812. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39200953 Free PMC article.
-
Physiological employment standards IV: integration of women in combat units physiological and medical considerations.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013 Nov;113(11):2673-90. doi: 10.1007/s00421-012-2558-7. Epub 2012 Dec 14. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2013. PMID: 23238928 Review.
-
Gender difference in anaerobic capacity: role of aerobic contribution.Br J Sports Med. 1993 Mar;27(1):45-8. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.27.1.45. Br J Sports Med. 1993. PMID: 8457813 Free PMC article.
-
Cross-validation of the 20- versus 30-s Wingate anaerobic test.Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007 Aug;100(6):645-51. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0454-3. Epub 2007 Apr 12. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2007. PMID: 17429677 Clinical Trial.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Miscellaneous