Re: "Functional Versus Anatomical Forms of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Differences in Severity, Symptoms, and Quality of Life"
- PMID: 37413683
- DOI: 10.1097/IOP.0000000000002360
Re: "Functional Versus Anatomical Forms of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Differences in Severity, Symptoms, and Quality of Life"
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no financial or conflicts of interest to disclose.
Comment on
- Functional Versus Anatomical Forms of Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction: Differences in Severity, Symptoms, and Quality of Life
References
-
- Functional versus anatomical nasolacrimal obstruction: are there differences in epiphora severity, symptoms, or effects on quality of life? Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022;38:567–570.
-
- Shapira Y, Macri C, Usmani E, et al. Outcomes of intubation and endoscopic DCR in functional nasolacrimal duct obstruction. Rhinology. 2022;60:308–312.
-
- Shivranjani S, Dwivedi J, Mithal N, et al. Study on management of epiphora in patients with obstruction at various levels of nasolacrimal apparatus. J Evol Med Dent Sci. 2015;4:14022–14033.
-
- Francis IC, Wan MK. The punctal apposition syndrome: a new surgical approach. Br J Ophthalmol. 2002;86:1256–1258.
-
- Jacobs HB. Symptomatic epiphora. Br J Ophthalmol. 1959;43:415–434.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources