Personalised management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy concept
- PMID: 37414020
- DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(23)00186-9
Personalised management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy concept
Abstract
Advances in the surgical and systemic therapeutic landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma have increased the complexity of patient management. A dynamic adaptation of the available staging-based algorithms is required to allow flexible therapeutic allocation. In particular, real-world hepatocellular carcinoma management increasingly relies on factors independent of oncological staging, including patients' frailty, comorbid burden, critical tumour location, multiple liver functional parameters, and specific technical contraindications impacting the delivery of treatment and resource availability. In this Policy Review we critically appraise how treatment allocation strictly based on pretreatment staging features has shifted towards a more personalised treatment approach, in which expert tumour boards assume a central role. We propose an evidence-based framework for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment based on the novel concept of multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy, in which different therapeutic options are ordered according to their survival benefit (ie, from surgery to systemic therapy). Moreover, we introduce the concept of converse therapeutic hierarchy, in which therapies are ordered according to their conversion abilities or adjuvant abilities (ie, from systemic therapy to surgery).
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of interests GC declares consulting fees from Bayer, Roche, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Eisai, and AstraZeneca. MI declares consulting fees and honoraria for lectures from Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Roche, Ipsen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Eisai. DJP declares grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and GlaxoSmithKline; consulting fees from Mina Therapeutics, Eisai, Roche, Avamune, DaVolterra, Mursla, H3B, Ipsen, Exact Sciences, and AstraZeneca; payment for lectures from Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Eisai; participation on advisory boards from Mina Therapeutics, Eisai, Roche, Avamune, DaVolterra, Mursla, H3B, Ipsen, LIfT Biosciences, Exact Sciences, and AstraZeneca. CC declares advisory board and speaker fees from Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Ipsen. GG declares honoraria from Roche and Eisai. LC declares consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Biomedical, GEM, and Terumo; and payment for lectures from Angiodynamics, AstraZeneca, Boston, Cascination, Terumo, Varian, and Esaote. EGG declares honoraria for lectures from Eisai, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Roche, and AstraZeneca. FF declares honoraria from Roche and Eisai. FT declares research funding from Roche, AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, and Bayer; consulting fees and advisory boards from Roche, AstraZeneca, Eisai, and Bayer. All other authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
The Concept of "Converse Therapeutic Hierarchy" for Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma.Liver Cancer. 2025 May 10:1-15. doi: 10.1159/000546360. Online ahead of print. Liver Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40496214 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Hepatocellular carcinoma: Revising the surgical approach in light of the concept of multiparametric therapeutic hierarchy.Dig Liver Dis. 2025 Apr;57(4):809-818. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2024.12.003. Epub 2025 Jan 18. Dig Liver Dis. 2025. PMID: 39828438 Review.
-
Adherence to AASLD guidelines for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in clinical practice: experience of the Bologna Liver Oncology Group.Dig Liver Dis. 2014 Jun;46(6):549-55. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2014.02.012. Epub 2014 Mar 14. Dig Liver Dis. 2014. PMID: 24630947
-
Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Directions.Gut Liver. 2015 Jul;9(4):437-48. doi: 10.5009/gnl15022. Gut Liver. 2015. PMID: 26087860 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Management of hepatocellular carcinoma.Clin Liver Dis. 2007 May;11(2):305-21. doi: 10.1016/j.cld.2007.04.007. Clin Liver Dis. 2007. PMID: 17606209 Review.
Cited by
-
Proper assessment and prognostication of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2024 Mar 7;23(1):e0129. doi: 10.1097/CLD.0000000000000129. eCollection 2024 Jan-Jun. Clin Liver Dis (Hoboken). 2024. PMID: 38455237 Free PMC article. Review. No abstract available.
-
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the Pre-Transplant Hepatocellular Carcinoma Setting: A Glimpse Beyond the Liver.Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Oct 30;25(21):11676. doi: 10.3390/ijms252111676. Int J Mol Sci. 2024. PMID: 39519230 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Survey of Clinical Practices for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Among Experts at Tertiary Hospitals in China From 2020 to 2021.Cancer Innov. 2025 Apr 7;4(3):e70006. doi: 10.1002/cai2.70006. eCollection 2025 Jun. Cancer Innov. 2025. PMID: 40196745 Free PMC article.
-
Survival path model outperforms conventional static machine learning models in long-term dynamic prognosis prediction for patients with intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma.Bioinform Adv. 2025 Feb 17;5(1):vbaf027. doi: 10.1093/bioadv/vbaf027. eCollection 2025. Bioinform Adv. 2025. PMID: 40201235 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with tyrosine kinase inhibitors versus HAIC monotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a multicenter propensity score matching analysis.Front Pharmacol. 2024 Jul 31;15:1410767. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1410767. eCollection 2024. Front Pharmacol. 2024. PMID: 39144625 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical