Do all roads lead to Rome?: A retrospective analysis on surgical technique in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
- PMID: 37415013
- DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10257-w
Do all roads lead to Rome?: A retrospective analysis on surgical technique in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Abstract
Background: New York University Langone Health has three accredited bariatric centers, with altogether ten different bariatric surgeons. This retrospective analysis compares individual surgeon techniques in laparoscopic or robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) to identify potential associations with perioperative morbidity and mortality.
Methods: All adult patients who underwent RYGB between 2017 and 2021 at NYU Langone Health campuses were evaluated via electronic medical records and MBSAQIP 30-day follow-up data. We surveyed all ten practicing bariatric surgeons to analyze the relationship between their techniques and total adverse outcomes. Bleeding, SSI, mortality, readmission, and reoperation were specifically sub-analyzed via logistic regression.
Results: 54 (7.59%) out of 711 patients who underwent laparoscopic or robotic RYGB encountered an adverse outcome. Lower adverse outcomes were observed with laparoscopic approach, creating the JJ anastomosis first, flat positioning, division of the mesentery, Covidien™ laparoscopic staplers, gold staples, unidirectional JJ anastomosis, hand-sewn common enterotomy, 100-cm Roux limb, 50-cm biliopancreatic limb, and routine EGD. Lower bleeding rates were observed with flat positioning, gold staples, hand-sewn common enterotomy, 50-cm biliopancreatic limb, and routine EGD. Lower readmission rates were observed in laparoscopic, flat positioning, Covidien™ staplers, unidirectional JJ anastomosis, and hand-sewn common enterotomy. Gold staples had lower reoperation rates. Otherwise, there was no statistically significant difference in SSI.
Conclusion: Certain surgical techniques in RYGB within our bariatric surgery group had significant effects on the rates of total adverse outcomes, bleeding, readmission, and reoperation. Our findings warrant further investigation into the aforementioned techniques via multivariate regression models or prospective study design.
Limitations: This study was limited by the inherent nature of its retrospective and univariate statistical design. We did not account for the interaction between techniques. The sample size of surgeons was small, and follow-up of 30 days was relatively short. We did not include patient characteristics in the model or control for surgeon skill.
Keywords: Bariatric surgery; Gastric bypass; Perioperative management; Roux-en-Y; Surgical technique; Weight-loss surgery.
© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.
Similar articles
-
Do all roads lead to Rome? A retrospective analysis on surgical technique in sleeve gastrectomy.Surg Endosc. 2023 Oct;37(10):8064-8071. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10298-1. Epub 2023 Jul 24. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37488445
-
Meta-analysis of hand-sewn versus mechanical gastrojejunal anastomosis during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity.Int J Surg. 2016 Aug;32:150-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.04.024. Epub 2016 Apr 21. Int J Surg. 2016. PMID: 27107663 Review.
-
Using video-based assessment (VBA) to document fellow improvement in safely completing the jejunojejunostomy portion of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery.Surg Endosc. 2023 Nov;37(11):8853-8860. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10425-y. Epub 2023 Sep 27. Surg Endosc. 2023. PMID: 37759145
-
Indications, safety, and feasibility of conversion of failed bariatric surgery to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a retrospective comparative study with primary laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass.Surg Endosc. 2012 Jul;26(7):1997-2002. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-2140-0. Epub 2012 Jan 19. Surg Endosc. 2012. PMID: 22258299
-
Comparative analysis of weight loss and resolution of comorbidities between laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on 18 studies.Int J Surg. 2020 Apr;76:101-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2020.02.035. Epub 2020 Mar 6. Int J Surg. 2020. PMID: 32151750
References
-
- Madan AK, Lo Menzo E, Dhawan N, Tichansky DS (2009) Internal hernias and nonclosure of mesenteric defects during laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg 19(5):549–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-008-9722-5 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Dang JT, Deprato A, Verhoeff K et al (2022) Variation of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass techniques: a survey of 518 bariatric surgeons. Obes Surg 32(7):2357–2365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-022-06087-9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kaijser MA, van Ramshorst GH, Emous M, Veeger NJGM, van Wagensveld BA, Pierie JEN (2018) A delphi consensus of the crucial steps in gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy procedures in the Netherlands. Obes Surg 28(9):2634–2643. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3219-7 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Economopoulos KP, Theocharidis V, McKenzie TJ, Sergentanis TN, Psaltopoulou T (2015) Robotic vs. laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 25(11):2180–2189. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-015-1870-9 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Wang L, Yao L, Yan P et al (2018) Robotic versus laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Surg 28(11):3691–3700. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-018-3458-7 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials