Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jan 13;8(1):1-4.
doi: 10.1093/fsr/owad001. eCollection 2023 Mar.

Risk of occupational infection in forensic workers: a review

Affiliations
Review

Risk of occupational infection in forensic workers: a review

Laurène Dufayet et al. Forensic Sci Res. .

Abstract

The occupational risk of infection in forensic workers is a cause for concern, furthermore in the current context of the coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) pandemic. In order to characterize this risk, we performed an extended review of the literature on occupational infections occurring in forensic workers. Seventeen articles were included. Direct contamination by aerosolization was the main mode of transmission reported, with 17 cases of tuberculosis. Indirect contamination was described as the mode of transmission in 10 cases (five cases of blastomycosis, two cases of tuberculosis, two Streptococcus pyogenes, and one case of human immunodeficiency virus). In all the other included cases, the mode of transmission was unknown. For two of them, the information provided was sufficient to link them to occupational exposure (one case of toxoplasmosis, one case of tuberculosis). For the remaining 10 cases, the link was uncertain (six cases of tuberculosis, three of hepatitis B, and one of COVID-19). Even if there is probably significant under-declaration, the number of infections linked to an occupational risk in forensic workers is not alarming, thanks to effective preventive measures.

Keywords: forensic sciences; forensic worker; infectious risk; occupational risk; review.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Shoja MM, Benninger B, Agutter P, et al. . A historical perspective: infection from cadaveric dissection from the 18th to 20th centuries. Clin Anat. 2013;26:154–160. - PubMed
    1. Grist NR, Emslie JA. Association of Clinical Pathologists’ surveys of infection in British clinical laboratories, 1970–1989. J Clin Pathol. 1994;47:391–394. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Douceron H, Deforges L, Gherardi R, et al. . Long-lasting postmortem viability of human immunodeficiency virus: a potential risk in forensic medicine practice. Forensic Sci Int. 1993;60:61–66. - PubMed
    1. Rashid Ali MRS, Parameswaran U, William T, et al. . A prospective study of mycobacterial viability in refrigerated, unpreserved sputum batched for up to 8 weeks. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19:620–621. - PubMed
    1. Schröder AS, Edler C, Ondruschka B, et al. . The handling of SARS-CoV-2 associated deaths—infectivity of the body. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2021;17:411–418. - PMC - PubMed