Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 28:2023:6018736.
doi: 10.1155/2023/6018736. eCollection 2023.

Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Pain Assessment: Research Methods and Perspectives

Affiliations
Review

Artificial Intelligence for Automatic Pain Assessment: Research Methods and Perspectives

Marco Cascella et al. Pain Res Manag. .

Abstract

Although proper pain evaluation is mandatory for establishing the appropriate therapy, self-reported pain level assessment has several limitations. Data-driven artificial intelligence (AI) methods can be employed for research on automatic pain assessment (APA). The goal is the development of objective, standardized, and generalizable instruments useful for pain assessment in different clinical contexts. The purpose of this article is to discuss the state of the art of research and perspectives on APA applications in both research and clinical scenarios. Principles of AI functioning will be addressed. For narrative purposes, AI-based methods are grouped into behavioral-based approaches and neurophysiology-based pain detection methods. Since pain is generally accompanied by spontaneous facial behaviors, several approaches for APA are based on image classification and feature extraction. Language features through natural language strategies, body postures, and respiratory-derived elements are other investigated behavioral-based approaches. Neurophysiology-based pain detection is obtained through electroencephalography, electromyography, electrodermal activity, and other biosignals. Recent approaches involve multimode strategies by combining behaviors with neurophysiological findings. Concerning methods, early studies were conducted by machine learning algorithms such as support vector machine, decision tree, and random forest classifiers. More recently, artificial neural networks such as convolutional and recurrent neural network algorithms are implemented, even in combination. Collaboration programs involving clinicians and computer scientists must be aimed at structuring and processing robust datasets that can be used in various settings, from acute to different chronic pain conditions. Finally, it is crucial to apply the concepts of explainability and ethics when examining AI applications for pain research and management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Automatic pain assessment in a cancer patient. “Pain” and “no-pain” states. Pretrained system based on a combination of computer vision and natural language processing methods. In the two selected frames, the system recognizes when the patient passes from a state of absence of pain (a) to a state of pain when she touches her right shoulder (b). The right shoulder is the site of a secondary bone lesion for breast cancer. Patient consent was acquired for the study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04726228) and scientific divulgation.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The ELAN tool (version 6.3) is implemented to combine and analyze frame-by-frame facial expressions (pain/no-pain) and language analysis including textual phonetic and prosodic analysis, sentimental analysis (e.g., neutral and disgust), and arousal. Patient consent was acquired for the study (clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT04726228) and scientific divulgation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Electrodermal activity recorded through the BITalino® platform (in the box).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Fink R. M., Brant J. M. Complex cancer pain assessment. Hematology-Oncology Clinics of North America . 2018;32(3):353–369. doi: 10.1016/j.hoc.2018.01.001. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cascella M., Vittori A., Petrucci E., et al. Strengths and weaknesses of cancer pain management in Italy: findings from a nationwide SIAARTI survey. Healthcare . 2022;10(3):p. 441. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10030441. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thong I. S. K., Jensen M. P., Miró J., Tan G. The validity of pain intensity measures: what do the NRS, VAS, VRS, and FPS-R measure? Scandinavian Journal of Pain . 2018;18(1):99–107. doi: 10.1515/sjpain-2018-0012. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fillingim R. B., Loeser J. D., Baron R., Edwards R. R. Assessment of chronic pain: domains, methods, and mechanisms. The Journal of Pain . 2016;17(9):T10–T20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2015.08.010. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cascella M., Monaco F., Nocerino D., et al. Bibliometric network analysis on rapid-onset opioids for breakthrough cancer pain treatment. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management . 2022;63(6):1041–1050. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2022.01.023. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources