Clinical outcomes and predictors of success with Impella weaning in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience
- PMID: 37416919
- PMCID: PMC10321515
- DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1171956
Clinical outcomes and predictors of success with Impella weaning in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience
Abstract
Introduction: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a severe syndrome with poor prognosis. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with Impella devices has emerged as an increasingly therapeutic option, unloading the failing left ventricle (LV) and improving hemodynamic status of affected patients. Impella devices should be used for the shortest time necessary to allow LV recovery because of time-dependent device-related adverse events. The weaning from Impella, however, is mostly performed in the absence of established guidelines, mainly based on the experience of the individual centres.
Methods: The aim of this single center study was to retrospectively evaluate whether a multiparametrical assessment before and during Impella weaning could predict successful weaning. The primary study outcome was death occurring during Impella weaning and secondary endpoints included assessment of in-hospital outcomes.
Results: Of a total of 45 patients (median age, 60 [51-66] years, 73% male) treated with an Impella device, 37 patients underwent impella weaning/removal and 9 patients (20%) died after the weaning. Non-survivors patients after impella weaning more commonly had a previous history of known heart failure (p = 0.054) and an implanted ICD-CRT (p = 0.01), and were more frequently treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (p = 0.02). In univariable logistic regression analysis, lactates variation (%) during the first 12-24 h of weaning, lactate value after 24 h of weaning, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the beginning of weaning, and inotropic score after 24 h from weaning beginning were associated with death. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression identified LVEF at the beginning of weaning and lactates variation (%) in the first 12-24 h from weaning beginning as the most accurate predictors of death after weaning. The ROC analysis indicated 80% accuracy (95% confidence interval = 64%-96%) using the two variables in combination to predict death after weaning from Impella.
Conclusions: This single-center experience on Impella weaning in CS showed that two easily accessible parameters as LVEF at the beginning of weaning and lactates variation (%) in the first 12-24 h from weaning begin were the most accurate predictors of death after weaning.
Keywords: Impella; cardiogenic shock; complications; heart failure; outcomes; weaning.
© 2023 Matassini, Marini, Angelozzi, Angelini, Shkoza, Compagnucci, Falanga, Battistoni, Pongetti, Francioni, Piva, Mucaj, Nicolini, Maolo, Di Eusanio, Munch, Dello Russo and Perna.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures





Similar articles
-
Prolonged Impella 5.0/5.5 support within different pathways of care for cardiogenic shock: the experience of a referral center.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 2;11:1379199. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1379199. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39015682 Free PMC article.
-
The "TIDE"-Algorithm for the Weaning of Patients With Cardiogenic Shock and Temporarily Mechanical Left Ventricular Support With Impella Devices. A Cardiovascular Physiology-Based Approach.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Feb 19;8:563484. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2021.563484. eCollection 2021. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 33681302 Free PMC article.
-
Rationale and Design of JenaMACS-Acute Hemodynamic Impact of Ventricular Unloading Using the Impella CP Assist Device in Patients with Cardiogenic Shock.J Clin Med. 2022 Aug 8;11(15):4623. doi: 10.3390/jcm11154623. J Clin Med. 2022. PMID: 35956238 Free PMC article.
-
Device profile of the Impella 5.0 and 5.5 system for mechanical circulatory support for patients with cardiogenic shock: overview of its safety and efficacy.Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022 Jan;19(1):1-10. doi: 10.1080/17434440.2022.2015323. Epub 2021 Dec 20. Expert Rev Med Devices. 2022. PMID: 34894975 Review.
-
Impella as unloading strategy during VA-ECMO: systematic review and meta-analysis.Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021 Dec 22;22(4):1503-1511. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2204154. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2021. PMID: 34957789
Cited by
-
Prolonged Impella 5.0/5.5 support within different pathways of care for cardiogenic shock: the experience of a referral center.Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Jul 2;11:1379199. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2024.1379199. eCollection 2024. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024. PMID: 39015682 Free PMC article.
-
Evolution of Cardiogenic Shock Management and Development of a Multidisciplinary Team-Based Approach: Ten Years Experience of a Single Center.J Clin Med. 2024 Apr 3;13(7):2101. doi: 10.3390/jcm13072101. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38610866 Free PMC article.
-
Concurrent Use of Kidney Replacement Therapy and Temporary Left Ventricular Assist Device in Cardiogenic Shock: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Blood Purif. 2025 Jun 18:1-16. doi: 10.1159/000546854. Online ahead of print. Blood Purif. 2025. PMID: 40532684 Free PMC article.
-
Mechanical Circulatory Support with Impella: Principles, Evidence, and Daily Practice.J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 6;13(16):4586. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164586. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 39200728 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Treatment time limit for successful weaning from veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock.ESC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;11(6):3767-3774. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14931. Epub 2024 Jul 11. ESC Heart Fail. 2024. PMID: 38992944 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin ML, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2022) 79(17):e263–421. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012 - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials