Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 21:10:1171956.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1171956. eCollection 2023.

Clinical outcomes and predictors of success with Impella weaning in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience

Affiliations

Clinical outcomes and predictors of success with Impella weaning in cardiogenic shock: a single-center experience

M V Matassini et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Introduction: Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a severe syndrome with poor prognosis. Short-term mechanical circulatory support with Impella devices has emerged as an increasingly therapeutic option, unloading the failing left ventricle (LV) and improving hemodynamic status of affected patients. Impella devices should be used for the shortest time necessary to allow LV recovery because of time-dependent device-related adverse events. The weaning from Impella, however, is mostly performed in the absence of established guidelines, mainly based on the experience of the individual centres.

Methods: The aim of this single center study was to retrospectively evaluate whether a multiparametrical assessment before and during Impella weaning could predict successful weaning. The primary study outcome was death occurring during Impella weaning and secondary endpoints included assessment of in-hospital outcomes.

Results: Of a total of 45 patients (median age, 60 [51-66] years, 73% male) treated with an Impella device, 37 patients underwent impella weaning/removal and 9 patients (20%) died after the weaning. Non-survivors patients after impella weaning more commonly had a previous history of known heart failure (p = 0.054) and an implanted ICD-CRT (p = 0.01), and were more frequently treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (p = 0.02). In univariable logistic regression analysis, lactates variation (%) during the first 12-24 h of weaning, lactate value after 24 h of weaning, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) at the beginning of weaning, and inotropic score after 24 h from weaning beginning were associated with death. Stepwise multivariable logistic regression identified LVEF at the beginning of weaning and lactates variation (%) in the first 12-24 h from weaning beginning as the most accurate predictors of death after weaning. The ROC analysis indicated 80% accuracy (95% confidence interval = 64%-96%) using the two variables in combination to predict death after weaning from Impella.

Conclusions: This single-center experience on Impella weaning in CS showed that two easily accessible parameters as LVEF at the beginning of weaning and lactates variation (%) in the first 12-24 h from weaning begin were the most accurate predictors of death after weaning.

Keywords: Impella; cardiogenic shock; complications; heart failure; outcomes; weaning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Variation of inotropic score (A) and arterial lactates (B) during impella support in survivor and non-survivor patients after Impella weaning.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cut-off analysis of Δ lactate (%) during first 12–24 h of weaning in predicting death after weaning. Cut-off = 0%; SE = 1; SP = 0.46; accuracy = 0.5946.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cut-off analysis of LVEF at onset of weaning in predicting death after weaning. Cut-off = 0.30; SE = 0.64; SP = 0.89; accuracy = 0.70.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of the multivariable prediction model for death after weaning from impella (accuracy = 0.80).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Risk of death according to quartile of admission period (1st quartile: April 28, 2014–August 20, 2018; 2nd quartile: August 20, 2018–October 14, 2019; 3rd quartile: October 14, 2019–July 12, 2020; 4th quartile: July 12, 2020–July 3, 2021). OR = 0.523, 95%, CI = 0.275–0.992, p = 0.0471.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Heidenreich PA, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Allen LA, Byun JJ, Colvin ML, et al. 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2022) 79(17):e263–421. 10.1016/j.jacc.2021.12.012 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vahdatpour C, Collins D, Goldberg S. Cardiogenic shock. J Am Heart Assoc. (2019) 8(8):1–12. 10.1161/JAHA.119.011991 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Diepen S, Katz JN, Albert NM, Henry TD, Jacobs AK, Kapur NK, et al. Contemporary management of cardiogenic shock: a scientific statement from the American heart association. Circ. (2017) 136:e232–68. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000525 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McDonagh TA, Metra M, Adamo M, Gardner RS, Baumbach A, Böhm M, et al. 2021 ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. (2021) 42(36):3599–726. 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gaudard P, Mourad M, Eliet J, Zeroual N, Culas G, Rouvière P, et al. Management and outcome of patients supported with Impella 5.0 for refractory cardiogenic shock. Crit Care. (2015) 19(1):1–12. 10.1186/s13054-015-1073-8 - DOI - PMC - PubMed