Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 7;102(27):e34254.
doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034254.

The efficacy of different interventions in the treatment of sarcopenia in middle-aged and elderly people: A network meta-analysis

Qian Geng  1 , Haiting Zhai  1   2 , Liming Wang  3 , Hongwen Wei  1 , Shilun Hou  1
Affiliations

The efficacy of different interventions in the treatment of sarcopenia in middle-aged and elderly people: A network meta-analysis

Qian Geng et al. Medicine (Baltimore). .

Abstract

Background: In this study, a meta-analysis system was used to evaluate the effects of 7 methods of treating sarcopenia, including resistance exercise, aerobic exercise, mixed exercise, nutrition, resistance combined with nutrition, mixed exercise combined with nutrition, and electric stimulation combined with nutrition, and their effects on physical function.

Methods: According to the PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and other foreign databases, as well as Chinese databases such as China National Knowledge Infrastructure and Wan Fang, the literatures of randomized controlled trials with different intervention measures were searched. ADDIS software was used to compare and rank the results of the network meta-analysis.

Results: A total of 2485 patients were included in the 30 randomized controlled trial items. According to the clinical manifestations of sarcopenia, 7 different forms of exercise and nutrition interventions can improve muscle strength, muscle mass, and physical function; in terms of improving muscle strength, resistance exercise has the most significant effect on improving grip strength (MD = 2.58, 95% confidence interval [CI] [1.06-4.07]); resistance exercise combined with nutrition lifting performed best in chair standing test (MD = -2.37, 95% CI [-4.73 to -0.33]). For muscle mass gains, resistance training increased appendicular skeletal muscle mass significantly (MD = 0.90, 95% CI [0.11-1.73]), while resistance exercise combined with nutrition significantly increased fat-free mass (MD = 5.15, 95% CI [0.91-9.43]). For physical activity, resistance training improved walk speed best (MD = 0.28, 95% CI [0.15-0.41]), and resistance exercise combined with nutrition in the best results were seen in the timed up and go test (MD = -2.31, 95% CI [-4.26 to -0.38]).

Conclusion: Compared with aerobic exercise, mixed exercise, nutrition, resistance combined with nutrition, mixed exercise combined with nutrition, and electric stimulation combined with nutrition, resistance exercise has more advantages in improving muscle mass, strength, and physical function performance. The clinical treatment of sarcopenia with resistance exercise intervention has a better curative effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram of study selection.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Diagram of the included literature with quality assessment.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Network diagram between studies in ASMM. ASMM = appendicular skeletal muscle mass.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Ranking diagram of outcome indicators.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Petermann-Rocha F, Balntzi V, Gray SR, et al. . Global prevalence of sarcopenia and severe sarcopenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2022;13:86–99. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nations, United. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. United Nations: 2019. Available at: https://www.un-ilibrary.org/content/books/9789210042352.
    1. Chen LK, Woo J, Assantachai P, et al. . Asian working group for sarcopenia: 2019 consensus update on sarcopenia diagnosis and treatment. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020;21:300–307.e2. - PubMed
    1. Agostini F, Bernetti A, Di Giacomo G, et al. . Rehabilitative good practices in the treatment of sarcopenia: a narrative review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2021;100:280–7. - PubMed
    1. Cederholm T, Barazzoni R, Austin P, et al. . ESPEN guidelines on definitions and terminology of clinical nutrition. Clin Nutr. 2017;36:49–64. - PubMed

Publication types