Accuracy of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Compared to High-Definition Ear Endoscopy to Assess Cholesteatoma Extension
- PMID: 37418100
- DOI: 10.1002/ohn.413
Accuracy of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Compared to High-Definition Ear Endoscopy to Assess Cholesteatoma Extension
Abstract
Objective: To correlate radiographic evidence of cholesteatoma in the retrotympanum with intraoperative endoscopic findings in cholesteatoma patients and to evaluate the clinical relevance of radiographic evidence of cholesteatoma in the retrotympanum.
Study design: Case series with chart review.
Setting: Tertiary referral center.
Methods: Seventy-six consecutive cases undergoing surgical cholesteatoma removal with preoperative high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) were enrolled in this study. A retrospective analysis of the medical records was conducted. The extension of cholesteatoma regarding different middle ear subspaces, into the antrum and mastoid were reviewed radiologically in preoperative HRCT and endoscopically from surgical videos. Additionally, facial nerve canal dehiscence, infiltration of the middle cranial fossa, and inner ear involvement were documented.
Results: Comparison of radiological and endoscopic cholesteatoma extension revealed statistically highly significant overestimation of radiological cholesteatoma extension for all retrotympanic regions (sinus tympani 61.8% vs 19.7%, facial recess 69.7% vs 43.4%, subtympanic sinus 59.2% vs 7.9%, and posterior sinus 72.4% vs 4.0%) and statistically significant overestimation for mesotympanum (82.9% vs 56.6%), hypotympanum (39.5% vs 9.2%), and protympanum (23.7% vs 6.6%). No statistically significant differences were found for epitympanum (98.7% vs 90.8%), antrum (64.5% vs 52.6%), and mastoid (26.3% vs 32.9%). Statistically significant radiological overestimation of facial nerve canal dehiscence (54.0% vs 25.0%) and invasion of tegmen tympani (39.5% vs 19.7%) is reported.
Conclusion: Radiologic cholesteatoma extension in different middle ear subspaces is overestimated compared to the intraoperative extension. The preoperative relevance of radiological retrotympanic extension might be limited in the choice of approach and transcanal endoscopic approach is always recommended first.
Keywords: cholesteatoma surgery; endoscopic ear surgery; radiomorphology; retrotympanum; temporal bone anatomy.
© 2023 The Authors. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Academy of Otolaryngology--Head and Neck Surgery Foundation.
Similar articles
-
Transcanal Endoscopic Ear Surgery for Middle Ear Cholesteatoma.Otol Neurotol. 2017 Jun;38(5):e41-e45. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000001395. Otol Neurotol. 2017. PMID: 28333776
-
Variability of the retrotympanum and its association with mastoid pneumatization in cholesteatoma patients.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023 Jan;280(1):131-136. doi: 10.1007/s00405-022-07465-w. Epub 2022 Jun 13. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2023. PMID: 35695918 Free PMC article.
-
Correlation of Radiologic Versus Endoscopic Visualization of the Middle Ear: Implications for Endoscopic Ear Surgery.Otol Neurotol. 2020 Oct;41(9):e1122-e1127. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000002787. Otol Neurotol. 2020. PMID: 32925849
-
Principles of endoscopic ear surgery.Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Oct;24(5):382-7. doi: 10.1097/MOO.0000000000000296. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016. PMID: 27455032 Review.
-
Transcanal endoscopic management of cholesteatoma.Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013 Apr;46(2):107-30. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Dec 20. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2013. PMID: 23566900 Review.
Cited by
-
Radioanatomical evaluation of the subtympanic sinus in children under five years old and its clinical implications - high resolution computed tomography study.Surg Radiol Anat. 2024 Dec;46(12):1965-1975. doi: 10.1007/s00276-024-03508-5. Epub 2024 Oct 23. Surg Radiol Anat. 2024. PMID: 39441351 Free PMC article.
-
Follow-up strategies in pediatric cholesteatoma: a systematic review.Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025 Jan;282(1):11-22. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08875-8. Epub 2024 Aug 4. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2025. PMID: 39097857
References
-
- Thomassin JM, Korchia D, Duchon Doris JM. Endoscopic-guided otosurgery in the prevention of residual cholesteatomas. Laryngoscope. 1993;103(8):939-943.
-
- Yung MMW. The use of rigid endoscopes in cholesteatoma surgery. J Laryngol Otol. 1994;108(4):307-309. doi:10.1017/S0022215100126611
-
- Badr-El-Dine M. Value of ear endoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery. Otol Neurotol. 2002;23(5):631-635.
-
- Ayache S, Tramier B, Strunski V. Otoendoscopy in cholesteatoma surgery of the middle ear: what benefits can be expected? Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(8):1085-1090.
-
- Migirov L, Shapira Y, Horowitz Z, Wolf M. Exclusive endoscopic ear surgery for acquired cholesteatoma: preliminary results. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(3):433-436.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources