Mapping Health Disparities in 11 High-Income Nations
- PMID: 37418259
- PMCID: PMC10329207
- DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.22310
Mapping Health Disparities in 11 High-Income Nations
Abstract
Importance: Health care delivery faces a myriad of challenges globally with well-documented health inequities based on geographic location. Yet, researchers and policy makers have a limited understanding of the frequency of geographic health disparities.
Objective: To describe geographic health disparities in 11 high-income countries.
Design, setting, and participants: In this survey study, we analyzed results from the 2020 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy (IHP) Survey-a nationally representative, self-reported, and cross-sectional survey of adults from Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, Switzerland, the UK, and the US. Eligible adults older than age 18 years were included by random sampling. Survey data were compared for the association of area type (rural or urban) with 10 health indicators across 3 domains: health status and socioeconomic risk factors, affordability of care, and access to care. Logistic regression was used to determine the associations between countries with area type for each factor, controlling for individuals' age and sex.
Main outcomes and measures: The main outcomes were geographic health disparities as measured by differences in respondents living in urban and rural settings in 10 health indicators across 3 domains.
Results: There were 22 402 survey respondents (12 804 female [57.2%]), with a 14% to 49% response rate depending on the country. Across the 11 countries and 10 health indicators and 3 domains (health status and socioeconomic risk factors, affordability of care, access to care), there were 21 occurrences of geographic health disparities; 13 of those in which rural residence was a protective factor and 8 of those where rural residence was a risk factor. The mean (SD) number of geographic health disparities in the countries was 1.9 (1.7). The US had statistically significant geographic health disparities in 5 of 10 indicators, the most of any country, while Canada, Norway, and the Netherlands had no statistically significant geographic health disparities. The indicators with the most occurrences of geographic health disparities were in the access to care domain.
Conclusions and relevance: In this survey study of 11 high-income nations, health disparities across 10 indicators were identified. Differences in number of disparities reported by country suggest that health policy and decision makers in the US should look to Canada, Norway, and the Netherlands to improve geographic-based health equity.
Conflict of interest statement
Figures
Similar articles
-
Equity of primary care service delivery for low income "sicker" adults across 10 OECD countries.Int J Equity Health. 2018 Dec 12;17(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0892-z. Int J Equity Health. 2018. PMID: 30541552 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of Health Care Experience and Access Between Young and Older Adults in 11 High-Income Countries.J Adolesc Health. 2015 Oct;57(4):413-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2015.05.015. Epub 2015 Jul 21. J Adolesc Health. 2015. PMID: 26205758
-
Inequities in access to medical care in five countries: findings from the 2001 Commonwealth Fund International Health Policy Survey.Health Policy. 2004 Mar;67(3):309-22. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2003.09.006. Health Policy. 2004. PMID: 15036818
-
The Impact of Age on Income-Related Health Status Inequalities from Birth to Adolescence: A Systematic Review with Cross-Country Comparisons.J Pediatr. 2018 Dec;203:380-390.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.07.030. Epub 2018 Sep 25. J Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 30266508
-
Disparities in Individuals' Access and Use of Health IT in 2013.2015 Jun. In: ASTP Health IT Data Brief [Internet]. Washington (DC): Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy; 2012. 26. 2015 Jun. In: ASTP Health IT Data Brief [Internet]. Washington (DC): Office of the Assistant Secretary for Technology Policy; 2012. 26. PMID: 40127353 Free Books & Documents. Review.
Cited by
-
Use of mortality tables by level of deprivation in the study of social inequalities in cancer survival.Eur J Epidemiol. 2025 Feb;40(2):213-223. doi: 10.1007/s10654-024-01199-1. Epub 2025 Feb 6. Eur J Epidemiol. 2025. PMID: 39912859 Free PMC article.
-
Priorities and expectations of researchers, funders, patients and the public regarding equity in medical research and funding: results from the PERSPECT qualitative study.Int J Equity Health. 2025 Apr 2;24(1):90. doi: 10.1186/s12939-025-02458-7. Int J Equity Health. 2025. PMID: 40175988 Free PMC article.
-
Comparative analysis of health status and health service utilization patterns among rural and urban elderly populations in Hungary: a study on the challenges of unhealthy aging.Geroscience. 2024 Apr;46(2):2017-2031. doi: 10.1007/s11357-023-00926-y. Epub 2023 Oct 6. Geroscience. 2024. PMID: 37798385 Free PMC article.
-
Social determinants of health and health disparities in glaucoma: A review.Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Apr;52(3):276-293. doi: 10.1111/ceo.14367. Epub 2024 Feb 22. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024. PMID: 38385607 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Clinical Trials and Therapeutic Approaches for Healthcare Challenges in Pakistan.J Pers Med. 2023 Oct 30;13(11):1559. doi: 10.3390/jpm13111559. J Pers Med. 2023. PMID: 38003874 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kochanek KD, Murphy SL, Xu J, Tejada-Vera B. Deaths: final data for 2014. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2016;65(4):1-122. - PubMed