Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Aug;85(6):1761-1767.
doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02754-w. Epub 2023 Jul 7.

Effect-less? Event-files are not terminated by distal action effects

Affiliations

Effect-less? Event-files are not terminated by distal action effects

Christian Frings et al. Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug.

Abstract

Event-files that bind features of stimuli, responses, and action effects figure prominently in contemporary views of action control. When a previous feature repeats, a previous event-file is retrieved and can influence current performance. It is unclear, however, what terminates an event-file. A tacit assumption is that registering the distal (e.g., visual or auditory) sensory consequences of an action (i.e., the "action effect") terminates the event-file, thereby making it available for retrieval. We tested three different action-effect conditions (no distal action effect, visual action effect, or auditory action effect) in the same stimulus-response (S-R) binding task and observed no modulation of S-R binding effects. Instead, there were comparably large binding effects in all conditions. This suggests that proximal (e.g., somatosensory, proprioceptive) action effects terminate event-files independent of distal (e.g., visual, auditory) action effects or that the role event-file termination plays for S-R binding effects needs to be corrected. We conclude that current views of action control require further specification.

Keywords: Action effects; Event-file termination; Perception and action.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Top: Schematic trial sequence for the three conditions: (1) no distal action effect (green), (2) visual action effect (orange), and (3) auditory action effect (blue). Stimuli are not drawn to scale, see text for further explanations. Bottom: Binding effects in milliseconds as a function of experimental condition depicted at the level of individual effects (left), group-level box plots (middle), and frequency distributions (right). * p < .001

References

    1. Chua L-K, Jimenez-Diaz J, Lewthwaite R, Kim T, Wulf G. Superiority of external attentional focus for motor performance and learning: Systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin. 2021;147(6):618–645. doi: 10.1037/bul0000335. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dutzi IB, Hommel B. The microgenesis of action-effect binding. Psychological Research. 2009;73(3):425–435. doi: 10.1007/s00426-008-0161-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Elsner B, Hommel B. Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2001;27(1):229–240. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang A-G, Buchner A. G*power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods. 2007;39(2):175–191. doi: 10.3758/bf03193146. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Foerster, A., Moeller, B., Huffman, G., Kunde, W., Frings, C., & Pfister, R. (2022). The human cognitive system corrects traces of error commission on the fly. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. Advance online publication. 10.1037/xge0001139 - PubMed