Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 15;23(12):5604.
doi: 10.3390/s23125604.

Evaluation Methods and Measurement Challenges for Industrial Exoskeletons

Affiliations

Evaluation Methods and Measurement Challenges for Industrial Exoskeletons

Ya-Shian Li-Baboud et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

In recent years, exoskeleton test methods for industrial exoskeletons have evolved to include simulated laboratory and field environments. Physiological, kinematic, and kinetic metrics, as well as subjective surveys, are used to evaluate exoskeleton usability. In particular, exoskeleton fit and usability can also impact the safety of exoskeletons and their effectiveness at reducing musculoskeletal injuries. This paper surveys the state of the art in measurement methods applied to exoskeleton evaluation. A notional classification of the metrics based on exoskeleton fit, task efficiency, comfort, mobility, and balance is proposed. In addition, the paper describes the test and measurement methods used in supporting the development of exoskeleton and exosuit evaluation methods to assess their fit, usability, and effectiveness in industrial tasks such as peg in hole, load align, and applied force. Finally, the paper includes a discussion of how the metrics can be applied towards a systematic evaluation of industrial exoskeletons, current measurement challenges, and future research directions.

Keywords: evaluation methods; exoskeleton; performance metrics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Position and Load Test Apparatus for Exoskeletons (PoLoTAE).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Exoskeleton performance-evaluation-method development process.The process includes selecting an exoskeleton that would be safe and fit for the task; identifying relevant information and exoskeleton evaluation standards framework; identifying relevant metrics; defining test procedures, including integration of measurement methods, for laboratory testing, and, similarly, defining test procedures and measurement methods for field testing.

References

    1. Injuries, Illnesses and Fatalities. Occupational Injuries and Illnesses Resulting in Musculoskeletal Disorders (MSDs), U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. [(accessed on 22 December 2022)]; Available online: https://www.bls.gov/iif/factsheets/msds.htm.
    1. Vergrift J.L., Gold J.E., Hanlon A., Punnett L. Physical and psychosocial ergonomic risk factors for low back pain in automobile manufacturing workers. Occup. Environ. Med. 2012;69:29–34. doi: 10.1136/oem.2010.061770. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yale Environmental Health and Safety Ergonomics: Awkward Posture. 2018. [(accessed on 22 December 2022)]. Available online: https://ehs.yale.edu/sites/default/files/files/ergo-awkward-posture.pdf.
    1. Liberty Mutual Insurance 2022 Workplace Safety Index. Jun, 2022. [(accessed on 22 December 2022)]. Available online: https://business.libertymutual.com/insights/2022-workplace-safety-index/
    1. Howard J., Murashov V.V., Lowe B.D., Lu M.L. Industrial exoskeletons: Need for intervention effec-tiveness research. Am. J. Ind. Med. 2020;63:201–208. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23080. - DOI - PubMed