Prevalence and Risk Factors for Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease and Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Revision Surgery: A Minimum of 5 Years' Follow-Up
- PMID: 37421142
- PMCID: PMC11877669
- DOI: 10.1177/21925682231185332
Prevalence and Risk Factors for Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease and Analysis of the Clinical Effect of Revision Surgery: A Minimum of 5 Years' Follow-Up
Abstract
Study design: A retrospective study was performed.
Objective: To investigate the prevalence and risk factors for adjacent segment disease (ASD) after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and the clinical efficacy of revision surgery.
Method: A total of 219 patients treated with ACDF were analyzed retrospectively. Demographic characteristics, including age, sex, body mass index (BMI) and bone mineral density (BMD), and radiographic measurements, including C2-C7 cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), T1 slope (T1S), thoracic inlet angle (TIA) and C2-C7 Cobb angle, were analyzed. Modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score and visual analog scale (VAS) score were used to evaluate patient function. Parameters were analyzed with Student's t test, and potential risk factors for ASD were further analyzed with multivariate logistic regression analysis.
Results: The incidence of ASD after ACDF surgeries was 21%. The severity of osteoporosis, BMI and C2-C7 cSVA were significantly higher in the ASD group than in the NASD group (P < .05). The preoperative and postoperative TIAs were lower in the ASD group (P < .05). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that a high BMI, severe osteoporosis and a high C2-C7 cSVA were risk factors for ASD after ACDF (P < .05). The postoperative TIA and postoperative T1S were also correlated with ASD (P < .05).
Conclusion: Patients with a high BMI, severe osteoporosis, and a large C2-C7 cSVA after ACDF have a higher risk of ASD, while a large T1S and TIA may be protective factors. In addition, revision surgery can restore cervical spine balance in patients with ASD and promote better clinical outcomes.
Keywords: adjacent segment disease; anterior cervical discectomy and fusion; revision surgery; risk factors; sagittal parameter.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Figures

Similar articles
-
There is no increased risk of adjacent segment disease at the cervicothoracic junction following an anterior cervical discectomy and fusion to C7.Spine J. 2017 Sep;17(9):1264-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.027. Epub 2017 Apr 26. Spine J. 2017. PMID: 28456670
-
Factors predicting adjacent segment disease after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion treating cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A retrospective study with 5-year follow-up.Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Oct;97(43):e12893. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000012893. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018. PMID: 30412087 Free PMC article.
-
Analysis of Cervical Sagittal Balance in Treating Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: 1-Level Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Versus 2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.Med Sci Monit. 2020 Jul 29;26:e923748. doi: 10.12659/MSM.923748. Med Sci Monit. 2020. PMID: 32726302 Free PMC article.
-
Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes for Patients with Cervical Adjacent Segment Disease Treated with Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Integrated Interbody Spacers.World Neurosurg. 2023 Dec;180:e514-e522. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.09.101. Epub 2023 Sep 28. World Neurosurg. 2023. PMID: 37774788 Review.
-
Radiographic Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Global Spine J. 2024 Sep;14(7):2183-2200. doi: 10.1177/21925682241237500. Epub 2024 Mar 12. Global Spine J. 2024. PMID: 38469858 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Risk factors for poor neurological recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: imaging characteristics.J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Jul 4;19(1):390. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-04886-7. J Orthop Surg Res. 2024. PMID: 38965626 Free PMC article.
-
Biomechanical comparison of multiple zero-profile systems in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 May 24;20(1):511. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05918-6. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40410783 Free PMC article.
-
Comparison of clinical efficacy of posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy versus unilateral biportal endoscopy key-hole techniques for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: a retrospective study with 2 years.J Orthop Surg Res. 2025 Feb 25;20(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13018-025-05617-2. J Orthop Surg Res. 2025. PMID: 40001180 Free PMC article.
-
Investigation of spinopelvic sagittal alignment and its correlations in asymptomatic pediatric populations.Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 26;15(1):6847. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-91481-3. Sci Rep. 2025. PMID: 40011699 Free PMC article.
-
Is screw position a greater contributor to adjacent segment disease than plate-to-disc distance following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion?BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Mar 26;26(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08285-9. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025. PMID: 40140965 Free PMC article.
References
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous