Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;34(1):37-55.
doi: 10.1007/s10926-023-10128-0. Epub 2023 Jul 8.

Informal Network Members' Perspectives and Experiences on Work for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Thematic Synthesis

Moniek A C Voermans  1   2 , Ton Wilthagen  3 , Petri J C M Embregts  4
Affiliations

Informal Network Members' Perspectives and Experiences on Work for People with Intellectual Disabilities: A Thematic Synthesis

Moniek A C Voermans et al. J Occup Rehabil. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Purpose: The level of participation of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) in various forms of work, including daytime activities, appears to be suboptimal. Informal networks of people with ID constitute crucial forms of support, as they can significantly influence occupational choices and opportunities. This review aims to synthesize existing research for the purpose of examining how informal network members perceive the meaning of employment or daytime activities for their relatives with ID.

Methods: Following the PRISMA guideline, a systematic search of scientific literature published between 1990 and July 2022 was conducted. The qualitative results from twenty-seven studies (qualitative and mixed-method) were analyzed using thematic synthesis.

Results: Four overarching themes and several subthemes were identified: (I) Ensuring customized work for my relative; (II) The ongoing need to collaborate and share care responsibilities with professionals; (III) The meaning of work for both my relative and myself; and (IV) Achieving full work participation for my relative is neither straightforward nor self-evident.

Conclusions: Informal networks place great value upon customized and sustainable work opportunities for their relatives with ID, particularly community-based work. While network members play an important role in creating these opportunities, they encounter obstacles resulting from both collaboration difficulties with professionals and employers and public and structural forms of stigma. Researchers, professionals, policy makers, and employers are encouraged to collaborate with individuals with ID as well as their networks to increase the meaningful work opportunities available to them.

Keywords: Daytime Activities; Employment; Informal Networks; Intellectual Disabilities; Work.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow-chart Study Selection
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

References

    1. Greenfield PM. Social change, cultural evolution, and human development. Curr Opin Psychol. 2016;8:84–92. - PubMed
    1. Altermark N. The post-institutional era: visions of history in research on intellectual disabilities. Disabil Soc. 2017;32(9):1315–32.
    1. Simpson MK. Power, ideology and structure: the legacy of normalization for intellectual disabilities. Soc Incl. 2018;6(2):12–21.
    1. Bigby C. The impact of policy tensions and organizational demands on the process of moving out of an institution. In: Johnson K, Traustadóttir R, editors. Deinstitutionalization and people with intellectual disabilities. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers; 2005. pp. 117–29.
    1. Lysaght R, Cobigo V, Hamilton K. Inclusion as a focus of employment-related research in intellectual disabilities from 2000 to 2010: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34(16):1339–50. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources