Natural history, predictors of development of extramedullary disease, and treatment outcomes for patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma
- PMID: 37421603
- DOI: 10.1002/ajh.27023
Natural history, predictors of development of extramedullary disease, and treatment outcomes for patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma
Erratum in
-
Correction to "Natural history, predictors of development of extramedullary disease, and treatment outcomes for patients with extramedullary multiple myeloma".Am J Hematol. 2024 Oct;99(10):2055. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27403. Epub 2024 Jul 12. Am J Hematol. 2024. PMID: 38994792 No abstract available.
Abstract
Extramedullary multiple myeloma (EMM) can present either at initial diagnosis (de novo) or at disease relapse (secondary) and confers an aggressive clinical course. Limited data exist for choosing the optimal therapy for EMM and this remains an area of unmet clinical need. After excluding paraskeletal multiple myeloma and primary plasma cell leukemia, we identified 204 (68%) patients with secondary EMM and 95 (32%) with de novo EMM between January 01, 2000 and 31 December, 2021. The median overall survival (OS) was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.6-0.9) years for secondary EMM and 3.6 (95%CI: 2.4-5.6) years for de novo EMM. The median progression-free survival (PFS) with initial therapy was 2.9 months (95% CI: 2.4-3.2 months) for secondary EMM and 12.9 months (95% CI: 6.7-18 months) for de novo EMM. Patients with secondary EMM treated with CAR-T therapy (n = 20) achieved a partial response (PR) or better in 75% with a median PFS of 4.9 months (3.1 months-not reached; NR). Patients with EMM treated with bispecific antibodies (n = 12) achieved a ≥ PR in 33%, with a median PFS of 2.9 months (95%CI: 2.2 months-NR). In a matched cohort, multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated younger age at diagnosis, 1q duplication, and t(4;14) at diagnosis of MM to be independent predictors of development of secondary EMM. Presence of EMM was independently associated with inferior OS in the matched cohorts for both de novo (HR 2.9 [95% CI: 1.6-5.4], p = .0007) and secondary EMM (HR 1.5 [95% CI: 1.1-2], p = .001).
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Manier S, Salem KZ, Park J, Landau DA, Getz G, Ghobrial IM. Genomic complexity of multiple myeloma and its clinical implications. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2017;14(2):100-113.
-
- Rasche L, Chavan SS, Stephens OW, et al. Spatial genomic heterogeneity in multiple myeloma revealed by multi-region sequencing. Nat Commun. 2017;8(1):268.
-
- Bianchi G, Ghobrial IM. Biological and clinical implications of clonal heterogeneity and clonal evolution in multiple myeloma. Curr Cancer Ther Rev. 2014;10(2):70-79.
-
- Lannes R, Samur M, Perrot A, et al. In multiple myeloma, high-risk secondary genetic events observed at relapse are present from diagnosis in tiny, undetectable subclonal populations. J Clin Oncol. 2023;41(9):1695-1702.
-
- Malek E, de Lima M, Letterio JJ, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells: the green light for myeloma immune escape. Blood Rev. 2016;30(5):341-348.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials