Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 8;18(1):11.
doi: 10.1186/s13021-023-00230-4.

A national assessment of urban forest carbon storage and sequestration in Canada

Affiliations

A national assessment of urban forest carbon storage and sequestration in Canada

James W N Steenberg et al. Carbon Balance Manag. .

Abstract

During a time of rapid urban growth and development, it is becoming ever more important to monitor the carbon fluxes of our cities. Unlike Canada's commercially managed forests that have a long history of inventory and modelling tools, there is both a lack of coordinated data and considerable uncertainty on assessment procedures for urban forest carbon. Nonetheless, independent studies have been carried out across Canada. To improve upon Canada's federal government reporting on carbon storage and sequestration by urban forests, this study builds on existing data to develop an updated assessment of carbon storage and sequestration for Canada's urban forests. Using canopy cover estimates derived from ortho-imagery and satellite imagery ranging from 2008 to 2012 and field-based urban forest inventory and assessment data from 16 Canadian cities and one US city, this study found that Canadian urban forests store approximately 27,297.8 kt C (- 37%, + 45%) in above and belowground biomass and sequester approximately 1497.7 kt C year-1 (- 26%, + 28%). In comparison with the previous national assessment of urban forest carbon, this study suggested that in urban areas carbon storage has been overestimated and carbon sequestration has been underestimated. Maximizing urban forest carbon sinks will contribute to Canada's mitigation efforts and, while being a smaller carbon sink compared to commercial forests, will also provide important ecosystem services and co-benefits to approximately 83% of Canadian people.

Keywords: Canopy cover; Climate change; Greenhouse gases (GHG); Land sector; Mitigation; National inventory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

I declare that the authors have no competing interests as defined by BMC, or other interests that might be perceived to influence the results and/or discussion reported in this paper.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
RUs with available urban forest assessment datasets for re-calculating carbon storage and sequestration densities. RU numbering is defined in Table 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
a Carbon storage and b carbon sequestration densities per unit tree cover for 18 RUs across Canada
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
A comparison of a carbon storage and b carbon sequestration assessed in this study with the assessed carbon values presented in Pasher et al. [22]

Similar articles

References

    1. Analytica. (n.d.). Version (4.5). Lumina Decision Systems—Analytics Software—Visual Modeling. https://analytica.com/. Accessed July 07 2023.
    1. Bratkovich S, Bowyer J. Urban tree utilization and why it matters . Minneapolis: Dovetail Partners, Inc; 2008.
    1. Ciecko L, Tenneson K, Dilley J, Wolf K. Seattle’s forest ecosystem values: analysis of the structure, function, and economic benefits. Seattle: Green Cities Research Alliance; 2012.
    1. Duinker P, Ordóñez C, Steenberg J, Miller K, Toni S, Nitoslawski S. Trees in canadian cities: indispensable life form for urban sustainability. Sustainability. 2015;7:7379–96. doi: 10.3390/su7067379. - DOI
    1. ECCC . National inventory report 1990–2020: greenhouse gas sources and sinks in Canada. Gatineau: ECCC; 2022.

LinkOut - more resources