A flexible matching strategy for matched nested case-control studies
- PMID: 37423269
- PMCID: PMC10538416
- DOI: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2023.06.023
A flexible matching strategy for matched nested case-control studies
Abstract
Purpose: Individual matching in case-control studies improves statistical efficiency over random selection of controls but can lead to selection bias if cases are excluded due to the lack of appropriate controls or residual confounding with less strict matching criteria. We introduce flex matching, an algorithm using multiple rounds of control selection with successively relaxed matching criteria to select controls for cases.
Methods: We simulated exposure-disease relationships in multiple cohort data sets with a range of confounding scenarios and conducted 16,800,000 nested case-control studies, comparing random selection of controls, strict matching, and flex matching. We computed average bias and statistical efficiency in estimates of exposure-disease relationships under each matching strategy.
Results: On average, flex matching produced the least biased estimates of exposure-disease associations with the smallest standard errors. Strict matching algorithms that excluded cases for whom matched controls could not be identified produced biased estimates with larger standard errors. Estimates from studies with random assignment of controls were relatively unbiased, but the standard errors were larger than from studies using flex matching.
Conclusions: Flex matching should be considered for case-control designs, especially for biomarker studies where matching on technical artifacts is necessary and maximizing efficiency is a priority.
Keywords: Bias; Confounding; Efficiency; Matching; Nested case-control studies.
Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships, which may be considered potential competing interests: Andrew G. Rundle reports financial support was provided by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences and the National Cancer Institute. Benjamin A. Rybicki reports financial support was provided by the National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. Stephen J. Mooney reports financial support was provided by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development and the EHE International.
Figures
References
-
- Arbuckle TE. Maternal-infant biomonitoring of environmental chemicals: the epidemiologic challenges. Birth defects research Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology. 2010;88(10):931–7. - PubMed
-
- Demirtas H, Amatya A, Doganay B. BinNor: An R package for concurrent generation of binary and normal data. Communications in Statistics-Simulation and Computation. 2014;43(3):569–79.
-
- Greenland S Small-sample bias and corrections for conditional maximum-likelihood odds-ratio estimators. Biostatistics. 2000;1(1):113–22. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
