Prevalence of surgical wound infection and related factors in patients after long bone surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 37424390
- PMCID: PMC10681458
- DOI: 10.1111/iwj.14300
Prevalence of surgical wound infection and related factors in patients after long bone surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Retraction in
-
RETRACTION: Prevalence of Surgical Wound Infection and Related Factors in Patients After Long Bone Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Int Wound J. 2025 Mar;22(3):e70296. doi: 10.1111/iwj.70296. Int Wound J. 2025. PMID: 40031899 Free PMC article.
Abstract
The goal of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to provide an overview of the prevalence of surgical wound infection and related factors in patients after long bone surgery. A comprehensive, systematic search was conducted in different international electronic databases, such as Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Persian electronic databases such as Iranmedex and Scientific Information Database using keywords extracted from Medical Subject Headings such as "Prevalence", "Surgical wound infection", "Surgical site infection" and "Orthopedics" from the earliest to the May 1, 2023. The appraisal tool for cross-sectional studies (AXIS tool) evaluates the quality of the included studies. A total of 71 854 patients undergoing long bone surgery participated in 12 studies. The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in patients who underwent long bone surgery reported in the 12 studies was 3.3% (95% CI: 1.5%-7.2%; I2 = 99.39%; p < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in male and female patients who underwent long bone surgery was 4.6% (95% CI: 1.7%-11.7%; p < 0.001; I2 = 99.34%) and 2.6% (95% CI: 1.0%-6.3%; I2 = 98.84%; p < 0.001), respectively. The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in patients with femur surgery sites reported in nine studies was 3.7% (95% CI: 2.1-6.4%; I2 = 93.43%; p < 0.001). The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in open and close fractures was 16.4% (95% CI: 8.2%-30.2%; I2 = 95.83%; p < 0.001) and 2.9% (95% CI: 1.5%-5.5%; I2 = 96.40%; p < 0.001), respectively. The pooled prevalence of surgical wound infection in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), hypertension (HTN) and cardiovascular disease (CVD) was 4.6% (95% CI: 2.3%-8.9%; I2 = 81.50%; p < 0.001), 2.7% (95% CI: 1.2%-6.0%; I2 = 83.82%; p < 0.001) and 3.0% (95% CI: 1.4%-6.4%; I2 = 69.12%; p = 0.006), respectively. In general, the different prevalence of surgical wound infection in patients undergoing surgical treatment after long bone fracture may be caused by underlying factors (gender and co-morbidity) and fracture-related factors (surgery site and type of fracture).
Keywords: meta-analysis; orthopaedics; prevalence; surgical site infection; surgical wound infection.
© 2023 The Authors. International Wound Journal published by Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
We do not have potential conflicts of interest concerning the research, authorship and publication of this article.
Figures
References
-
- Pasco JA, Lane SE, Brennan‐Olsen SL, et al. The epidemiology of incident fracture from cradle to senescence. Calcif Tissue Int. 2015;97:568‐576. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
