Venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation in spinal cord lesion rehabilitation inpatients: A 10-year retrospective study
- PMID: 37424485
- PMCID: PMC10473086
- DOI: 10.3233/NRE-230063
Venous thromboembolism and anticoagulation in spinal cord lesion rehabilitation inpatients: A 10-year retrospective study
Abstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a concern following the onset of spinal cord lesions (SCL).
Objectives: To assess the current efficacy and risks of anticoagulation after SCL and consider changes in thromboprophylaxis.
Methods: This retrospective cohort study included individuals admitted to inpatient rehabilitation within 3 months of SCL onset. Main outcome measures were the incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT), pulmonary embolism (PE), bleeding, thrombocytopenia, or death, which occurred within 1 year of the SCL onset.
Results: VTE occurred in 37 of the 685 patients included in the study (5.4%, 95% CI 3.7-7.1%, 2.8% PE), and in 16 of 526 patients who received prophylactic anticoagulation at rehabilitation (3%, 95% CI 1.6-4.5%, 1.1% PE, with at least 1 fatality). Of these 526, 1.3% developed clinically significant bleeding and 0.8% thrombocytopenia. Prophylactic anticoagulation, most commonly 40 mg/day, continued until a median period of 6.4 weeks after SCL onset (25% -75% percentiles 5.8-9.7), but in 29.7%, VTE occurred more than 3 months after SCL onset.
Conclusion: The VTE prophylaxis used for the present cohort contributed to a considerable but limited reduction of VTE incidence. The authors recommend conducting a prospective study to assess the efficacy and safety of an updated preventive anticoagulation regimen.
Keywords: Deep vein thrombosis; anticoagulation; prophylaxis; pulmonary embolism; spinal cord lesions.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures


References
-
- Aito, S., Pieri, A., D’Andrea, M., Marcelli, F., & Cominelli, E. (2002). Primary prevention of deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in acute spinal cord injured patients. Spinal Cord 40(6), 300–303. - PubMed
-
- de Almeida, R. L., Rodrigues, C. C., Melo e Silva, C. A., Beraldo, P. S. S., & Amado, V. M. (2019). Comparison of two pharmacological prophylaxis strategies for venous thromboembolism in spinal cord injury patients: a retrospective study. Spinal Cord 57(10), 890–896. - PubMed
-
- Anderson F. A. Jr,, & Spencer, F. A. (2003). Risk factors for venous thromboembolism. Circulation 107(23_suppl_1), I-9. - PubMed
-
- Arnold, P. M., Harrop, J. S., Merli, G., Tetreault, L. G., Kwon, B. K., Casha, S., & Norvell, D. C. (2017). Efficacy, safety, and timing of anticoagulant thromboprophylaxis for the prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a systematic review. Global Spine Journal 7(3_suppl), 138S–150S. - PMC - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous