Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 23:10:1202381.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1202381. eCollection 2023.

Application of next generation sequencing in cardiology: current and future precision medicine implications

Affiliations
Review

Application of next generation sequencing in cardiology: current and future precision medicine implications

Eirini Papadopoulou et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Inherited cardiovascular diseases are highly heterogeneous conditions with multiple genetic loci involved. The application of advanced molecular tools, such as Next Generation Sequencing, has facilitated the genetic analysis of these disorders. Accurate analysis and variant identification are required to maximize the quality of the sequencing data. Therefore, the application of NGS for clinical purposes should be limited to laboratories with a high level of technological expertise and resources. In addition, appropriate gene selection and variant interpretation can result in the highest possible diagnostic yield. Implementation of genetics in cardiology is imperative for the accurate diagnosis, prognosis and management of several inherited disorders and could eventually lead to the realization of precision medicine in this field. However, genetic testing should also be accompanied by an appropriate genetic counseling procedure that clarifies the significance of the genetic analysis results for the proband and his family. In this regard, a multidisciplinary collaboration among physicians, geneticists, and bioinformaticians is imperative. In the present review, we address the current state of knowledge regarding genetic analysis strategies employed in the field of cardiogenetics. Variant interpretation and reporting guidelines are explored. Additionally, gene selection procedures are accessed, with a particular emphasis on information concerning gene-disease associations collected from international alliances such as the Gene Curation Coalition (GenCC). In this context, a novel approach to gene categorization is proposed. Moreover, a sub-analysis is conducted on the 1,502,769 variation records with submitted interpretations in the Clinical Variation (ClinVar) database, focusing on cardiology-related genes. Finally, the most recent information on genetic analysis's clinical utility is reviewed.

Keywords: cardiogenetics; cardiovascular diseases; genetic analysis; next generation sequencing; personalized treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

EP, DB, GT, AP, GN were employed by Genekor Medical S.A. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Upset plot of the different gene sets among the cardiovascular disease-related genes with the distinct combinations among categories. An interactive version of the plot is also in the supplementary files section and in the link https://tinyurl.com/upsetplot. DCM is highlighted as an example where 23/55 of the associated genes are unique for DCM and the remaining 32 show overlap among the different groups as shown in orange and through the lines that connect the dots at the level of DCM.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Statistics on classification and reclassification from ClinVar (Aug 2016–Aug 2022) for genes related to cardiac diseases. (A) The distribution of the 232,025 starting classifications for genes related to cardiac diseases to the five standard ACMG/AMP classification terms and reclassification statistics for each category relative to the percentage of the initial classification group. (B) Percentages relative to the number of all reclassifications.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Schematic representation of the workflow used for appropriate classification and interpretation of the genetic variants in clinical practice (details in text). 1000G, 1,000 Genomes; ESP6500, NHLBI Exome Sequencing Project; ExAC, Exome Aggregation Consortium; gnomAD, Genome Aggregation Database; ClinVar, Clinical Variation database; OMIM, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man; LSDBs, Locus Specific Databases; HGVS, Human Genome Variation Society; HPO, Human Phenotype Ontology; ACMG, American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics; AMP, Association for Molecular Pathology; ClinGen, Clinical Genome Resource; VCEP, Variant Curation Expert Panel.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kathiresan S, Srivastava D. Genetics of human cardiovascular disease. Cell. (2012) 148(6):1242–57. 10.1016/j.cell.2012.03.001 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tanai E, Frantz S. Pathophysiology of heart failure. Compr Physiol. (2016) 6(1):187–214. 10.1002/cphy.c140055 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Tsao CW, Aday AW, Almarzooq ZI, Alonso A, Beaton AZ, Bittencourt MS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2022 update: a report from the American heart association. Circulation. (2022) 145(8):e153–e639. 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001052 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Adhikary D, Barman S, Ranjan R, Stone H. A systematic review of Major cardiovascular risk factors: a growing global health concern. Cureus. (2022) 14(10):e30119. 10.7759/cureus.30119 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lavie CJ, Ozemek C, Carbone S, Katzmarzyk PT, Blair SN. Sedentary behavior, exercise, and cardiovascular health. Circ Res. (2019) 124(5):799–815. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.312669 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources