Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jun 1;V18(3):551-557.
doi: 10.26603/001c.77508. eCollection 2023.

The Evolution of Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Following Cartilage Surgery

Affiliations

The Evolution of Rehabilitation and Return to Sport Following Cartilage Surgery

Snehal Patel et al. Int J Sports Phys Ther. .

Abstract

Rehabilitation after knee cartilage repair or restoration can be a challenging and nuanced process. Historically, conservative rehabilitation protocols have been characterized by limited weightbearing and restricted range of motion (ROM) were created to primarily protect the repaired cartilage but did little for progression into higher level activity. Recent literature has supported accelerated protocols in a variety of cartilage procedures ranging from osteochondral allograft (OCA) Osteochondral autograft surgery (OATS) to matrix-based scaffolding procedures such as Matrix Induced Chondrocyte Implantation (MACI) or Denovo procedures. Advances in technology such as blood flow restriction (BFR) and testing equipment with progressive rehabilitation from the acute phase through the return to sport continuum have made it possible to return to a higher level of activity and performance than first thought of for these procedures. This clinical viewpoint discusses the evolution of knee cartilage rehabilitation characterized by early but progressive weightbearing and early ROM while maintaining early homeostasis in the knee, and then its progression to return to sport and performance in the higher-level athlete.

Level of evidence: V.

Keywords: MACI; OATS; OCA; cartilage rehab; knee.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Farr J, Cole B, Dhawan A, Kercher J, Sherman S. Clinical cartilage restoration: evolution and overview. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(10):2696-2705. doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1764-z - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dhillon J, Fasulo SM, Kraeutler MJ, Belk JW, McCulloch PC, Scillia AJ. The Most Common Rehabilitation Protocol After Matrix-Assisted Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Is Immediate Partial Weight-Bearing and Continuous Passive Motion. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2022;4(6):e2115-e2123. doi:10.1016/j.asmr.2022.09.007 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kane MS, Lau K, Crawford DC. Rehabilitation and postoperative management practices after osteochondral allograft transplants to the distal femur: a report from the Metrics of Osteochondral Allografts (MOCA) Study Group 2016 Survey. Sports Health. 2017;9(6):555-563. doi:10.1177/1941738117717011 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Behrens F, Kraft EL, Oegema TR Jr. Biochemical changes in articular cartilage after joint immobilization by casting or external fixation. J Orthop Res. 1989;7(3):335-343. doi:10.1002/jor.1100070305 - PubMed
    1. Haapala J, Arokoski J, Pirttimäki J, et al. Incomplete restoration of immobilization induced softening of young beagle knee articular cartilage after 50-week remobilization. Int J Sports Med. 2000;21(1):76-81. doi:10.1055/s-2000-8860 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources