Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jul 2:16:1215-1228.
doi: 10.2147/RMHP.S417672. eCollection 2023.

A Bibliometric Analysis of Diagnosis Related Groups from 2013 to 2022

Affiliations
Review

A Bibliometric Analysis of Diagnosis Related Groups from 2013 to 2022

Xiaona Lang et al. Risk Manag Healthc Policy. .

Abstract

Purpose: As an important management method of the global healthcare system, diagnosis related groups (DRGs) classify patients into different cost groups and pay more attention to the equitable distribution of medical resources and the quality of medical services. At present, most countries have used DRGs to help medical institutions and doctors to treat patients more accurately, avoid the waste of medical resources, and improve treatment efficiency.

Methods: The Web of Science database was searched to collect all relevant literature on DRGs from 2013 to 2022. The literature information was imported into CiteSpace, Vosviewer, and Histcite for data analysis and visualization of the results. Analyze the cooperative relationship among the countries, institutions, journals, and authors. The usage trend of keywords; Highlight the content of the cited articles.

Results: The number of articles published in this decade was stable, and the number of citations in 2014 was the highest. The United States and Germany, as the first countries to use the DRGs system, are ahead of other countries in terms of the number and quality of articles. We have carried out content research on the articles with high citations, and summarized the application range of DRGs; classification method; advantages and disadvantages of the application. In general, the development trend of DRGs in foreign countries is to continuously optimize the classification method, expand the scope of application, and improve the application effect. These provide support and reference for the improvement of medical services and the perfection of the medical insurance system.

Conclusion: The application of DRGs can improve the quality and efficiency of medical services, and reduce the waste of medical expenses. It can also promote the rational allocation of medical resources and the equity of medical services. In the future, DRGs will pay more attention to the personalized diagnosis and treatment and fine management of patients, and the sharing and standardization of medical data, to promote the development of medical informatization.

Keywords: DRGs; bibliometrics; costs; healthcare; surgery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The process of literature screening.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(A) Yearly output and score; (B) Distribution of global publications in the field of DRGs; (C) Academic cooperation networks between countries/regions.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(A) Academic cooperation networks between institutions; (B) Academic cooperation networks between authors.
Figure 4
Figure 4
(A) The top 20 strongest strength citation burst; (B) Networks of keywords in the studies.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The cluster map of document co-citation.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Different classifications of DRGs.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Quentin W, Scheller-Kreinsen D, Blumel M, Geissler A, Busse R. Hospital payment based on diagnosis-related groups differs in Europe and holds lessons for the United States. Health Aff. 2013;32(4):713–723. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2012.0876 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Quinn K. After the revolution: dRGs at age 30. Ann Intern Med. 2014;160(6):426–429. doi:10.7326/m13-2115 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chin N, Perera P, Roberts A, Nagappan R. Review of medical discharge summaries and medical documentation in a metropolitan hospital: impact on diagnostic-related groups and Weighted Inlier Equivalent Separation. Intern Med J. 2013;43(7):767–771. doi:10.1111/imj.12084 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mathauer I, Wittenbecher F. Hospital payment systems based on diagnosis-related groups: experiences in low- and middle-income countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2013;91(10):746–756. doi:10.2471/blt.12.115931 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pongpirul K, Robinson C. Hospital manipulations in the DRG system: a systematic scoping review. Asian Biomed. 2013;7(3):301–310. doi:10.5372/1905-7415.0703.180 - DOI