Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 22:14:1172340.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1172340. eCollection 2023.

Composition of subgingival microbiota associated with periodontitis and diagnosis of malignancy-a cross-sectional study

Affiliations

Composition of subgingival microbiota associated with periodontitis and diagnosis of malignancy-a cross-sectional study

Aswathy Narayanan et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Periodontitis is one of the world's most prevalent infectious conditions, affecting between 25 and 40% of the adult population. It is a consequence of the complex interactions between periodontal pathogens and their products, which trigger the host inflammatory response, chronic inflammation, and tissue destruction. Chronic systemic low-grade inflammation is involved in numerous diseases, and it is also known that long-lasting inflammation and chronic infections predispose one to cancer. Here, we characterized and compared the subgingival microbiota associated with periodontitis and diagnosis of malignancy in a longitudinal 10-year follow-up study. The study was conducted on 50 patients with periodontitis and 40 periodontally healthy individuals. The recorded clinical oral health parameters were periodontal attachment loss (AL), bleeding on probing (BOP), gingival index (GI), probing depth (PD), and plaque index (PI). Subgingival plaque was collected from each participant, from which DNA was extracted, and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing performed. Cancer diagnoses data were collected between the years 2008-2018 from the Swedish Cancer Registry. The participants were categorized based on having cancer at the time of sample collection (CSC), having developed cancer later (DCL), and controls without any cancer. The most abundant phyla across all 90 samples were Actinobacteria, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, and Fusobacteria. At the genus level, Treponema, Fretibacterium, and Prevotella were significantly more abundant in samples of periodontitis patients compared to non-periodontitis individuals. With regard to samples of cancer patients, Corynebacterium and Streptococcus were more abundant in the CSC group; Prevotella were more abundant in the DCL group; and Rothia, Neisseria, and Capnocytophaga were more abundant in the control group. In the CSC group, we also found that the presence of periodontal inflammation, in terms of BOP, GI, and PLI, significantly correlated with species belonging to the genera Prevotella, Treponema, and Mycoplasma. Our results revealed that several subgingival genera were differentially enriched among the studied groups. These findings underscore the need for further research to fully understand the role that oral pathogens may play in the development of cancer.

Keywords: 16S rRNA gene sequencing; cancer; malignancy; oral microbiota; periodontitis; supragingival plaque.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Relative abundance and beta diversity between groups. (A) Relative abundance of the most abundant organisms of all the 90 samples at the genus level grouped according to disease status (i.e., periodontitis or non-periodontitis). (B) Difference in beta diversity between the groups represented as non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plots using Bray–Curtis distances; the separations between groups at each axis are seen in respective boxplot. The boxplots represent the median (horizontal black line), 25th and 75th quartiles (box edge), and upper and lower ends (whiskers).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Relative abundance plots of microbiome compositions at different taxonomic levels and comparisons of alpha and beta diversity between periodontitis (P) and non-periodontitis (NP) individuals. Distribution of abundant organisms at the (A) phylum, (B) family, and (C) genus levels. (D) Extended error barplot showing the most abundant microbiome compositions between periodontitis and non-periodontitis individuals at the genus level. Organisms with a mean relative abundance of at least 1% across all samples are represented in different colors, whereas those with <1% abundance and unclassified are represented as “Unknown/Others”. The microbial communities denoted with an asterisk (*) are the significant ones between groups.
Figure 3
Figure 3
PERMANOVA analysis of microbial composition between the periodontitis and non-periodontitis groups at the genus level.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Distribution of the most abundant microbiome compositions between control, cancer at sample collection (CSC), and developed cancer later (DCL) groups at the (A) phylum, (B) family, and (C) genus levels. (D) Extended error barplot showing the distribution of the most abundant microbiome compositions between control, CSC and DCL groups at the genus level. Organisms with a mean relative abundance of at least 1% across all samples are represented in different colors, whereas those with <1% abundance and unclassified are represented as “Unknown/Others”.
Figure 5
Figure 5
PERMANOVA analysis of microbial composition between control and cancer groups at the genus level: (A) cancer at sample collection (CSC) vs. control; (B) developed cancer later (DCL) vs. control.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Spearman rank correlation analysis between subgingival microbiota and periodontal clinical parameters (AL, BOP, GI, PD, PLI). The heatmap shows statistically significant (p < 0.05) correlations between microbial taxa (at the species level) and periodontal parameters for the (A) cancer at sample collection (CSC), (B) developed cancer later (DCL), and (C) control groups. Positive correlations are displayed in red and negative correlations in blue color.

References

    1. Aas J. A., Paster B. J., Stokes L. N., Olsen I., Dewhirst F. E. (2005). Defining the normal bacterial flora of the oral cavity. J. Clin. Microbiol. 43, 5721–5732. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.11.5721-5732.2005, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Abdulamir A. S., Hafidh R. R., Abu Bakar F. (2011). The association of Streptococcus bovis/gallolyticus with colorectal tumors: the nature and the underlying mechanisms of its etiological role. J. Exp. Clin. Cancer Res. 30:11. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-30-11, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ahn J., Chen C. Y., Hayes R. B. (2012). Oral microbiome and oral and gastrointestinal cancer risk. Cancer Causes Control 23, 399–404. doi: 10.1007/s10552-011-9892-7, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Anderson M. J. (2017). Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA). Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online, 1–15. doi: 10.1002/9781118445112.stat07841 - DOI
    1. Andrews S. (2015). FASTQC a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data. Babraham Institute. Available at: https://www.bibsonomy.org/bibtex/f230a919c34360709aa298734d63dca3