Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Mar 24;7(4):527-531.
doi: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.02.017. eCollection 2023 Jul.

Conservative treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint separation: a randomized controlled trial sling vs. brace

Michael Finsterwald  1 , Mai Lan Dao Trong  1 , David Hollo  2 , Andreas M Müller  2 , Ulf Riede  1 , Samy Bouaicha  1   3
Affiliations

Conservative treatment of Rockwood type III acromioclavicular joint separation: a randomized controlled trial sling vs. brace

Michael Finsterwald et al. JSES Int. .

Abstract

Background: Management of Rockwood III acromioclavicular joint separations is a matter of ongoing debate, with nonoperative treatment being favored in recent literature. The aim of this study is to compare clinical and radiological outcomes of nonoperative treatment with a brace, which elicits a direct reduction force to the distal clavicle, to a sling. We hypothesized the brace might yield in better acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) reduction and cosmesis.

Methods: In this dual center prospective randomized controlled trial, all patients sustaining an acromioclavicular joint separation Rockwood III between July 2017 and August 2020 were included. Patients with previous ipsi- or contralateral ACJ injury or surgery were excluded. Randomization occurred in the emergency department to either the sling or brace group. Patients were followed up at 1, 6, and 12 weeks. Patient-reported outcome measures included subjective shoulder value (SSV) and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) score at each follow-up and Constant Score at 6 and 12 weeks. Vertical distal clavicle displacement was assessed on bilateral non-weighted panoramic anteroposterior radiographs using coracoclavicular (CC) distance to calculate the CC-index.

Results: Thirty-five consecutive patients were included across the 2 sites, 18 (all male) in the brace and 17 (14 male) in the sling group. Baseline characteristics did not differ significantly between groups, the average age was 40 years, and body mass index 25.5 kg/m2. Analysis revealed no statistical difference in CC-index between groups at the time of injury, 6 weeks and 12 weeks postinjury (P = .39, P = .11, and P = .21). SSV improved from 30 and 35 postinjury to 81 and 84 at 12 weeks in the sling and brace group, respectively (P = .59). ASES improved from 48 and 38 to 82 and 83, respectively (P = .84). Similarly, Constant Score improved from 64 and 67 to 82 and 81, respectively (P = .90). One patient in the brace group underwent ACJ stabilization with hamstring autograft at 4 months due to persistent pain.

Conclusion: This randomized controlled trial shows no statistically significant difference between the brace and sling group in clinical (SSV, ASES, Constant Score) or radiological (CC-index) outcomes after conservative treatment of Rockwood III injuries.

Keywords: Acromioclavicular joint dislocation; Acromioclavicular joint separation; Brace; Conservative treatment; Rockwood III; Tossy III.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) Patient wearing sling. (b) Patient wearing Brace.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Allman F.L. Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1967;49:774–784. - PubMed
    1. Bannister G.C., Wallace W.A., Stableforth P.G., Hutson M.A. The management of acute acromioclavicular dislocation. A randomised prospective controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1989;71:848–850. - PubMed
    1. Bradley J.P., Elkousy H. Decision making: operative versus nonoperative treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2003;22:277–290. doi: 10.1016/S0278-5919(02)00098-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Chang N., Furey A., Kurdin A. Operative versus nonoperative management of acute high-grade acromioclavicular dislocations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Trauma. 2018;32:1–9. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000001004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Constant C.R., Murley A.H. A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop. 1987:160–164. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources