Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 1986 Sep;74(3 Pt 2):I82-7.

Results of mitral valve reconstruction

  • PMID: 3742777

Results of mitral valve reconstruction

D M Cosgrove et al. Circulation. 1986 Sep.

Abstract

To evaluate the early results of mitral valve reconstruction for mitral insufficiency, 117 consecutive cases were analyzed. Sixty-four (57.7%) of the patients were men, and the mean age was 60 +/- 13 years (range 18 to 85). Eighty-nine (76%) of the patients were in NYHA functional class III or IV preoperatively. The cause of the mitral disease was degenerative in 94 (80%) and rheumatic in 13 (11%) patients. Isolated mitral valve repair was performed in 56 patients (47.9%); the remainder underwent associated procedures that included myocardial revascularization in 38 (32.5%). Ninety-nine (85%) underwent a ring annuloplasty but in only seven (6%) was this the only repair technique. Resection of the posterior leaflet was performed in 41 (35%). There were five operative deaths (4.3%); one (1.8%) occurred after isolated repair and four (6.5%) after repair with associated procedures. All deaths occurred in patients greater than 65 years of age who were in NYHA functional class III or IV. Mean follow-up was 13.5 months (range 1 to 62). Two year actuarial survival was 90.6%. Three patients required reoperation (incidence of 2.5% per patient-year). Two patients sustained embolic events (incidence of 1.6% per patient-year). There were no anticoagulant-related complications. After surgery, 100 survivors (96.2%) were in NYHA functional class I or II.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

LinkOut - more resources