Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Mar;309(3):755-764.
doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07126-1. Epub 2023 Jul 10.

Uterine cervical stenosis: from classification to advances in management. Overcoming the obstacles to access the uterine cavity

Affiliations
Review

Uterine cervical stenosis: from classification to advances in management. Overcoming the obstacles to access the uterine cavity

Salvatore Giovanni Vitale et al. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: To date hysteroscopy is the gold standard technique for the evaluation and management of intrauterine pathologies. The cervical canal represents the access route to the uterine cavity. The presence of cervical stenosis often makes entry into the uterine cavity difficult and occasionally impossible. Cervical stenosis has a multifactorial etiology. It is the result of adhesion processes that can lead to the narrowing or total obliteration of the cervical canal.

Purpose: In this review, we summarize the scientific evidence about cervical stenosis, aiming to identify the best strategy to overcome this challenging condition.

Methods: The literature review followed the scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (SANRA). All articles describing the hysteroscopic management of cervical stenosis were considered eligible. Only original papers that reported data on the topic were included.

Results: Various strategies have been proposed to address cervical stenosis, including surgical and non-surgical methods. Medical treatments such as the preprocedural use of cervical-ripening agents or osmotic dilators have been explored. Surgical options include the use of cervical dilators and hysteroscopic treatments.

Conclusions: Cervical stenosis can present challenges in achieving successful intrauterine procedures. Operative hysteroscopy has been shown to have the highest success rate, particularly in cases of severe cervical stenosis, and is currently considered the gold standard for managing this condition. Despite the availability of miniaturized instruments that have made the management of cervical stenosis more feasible, it remains a complex task, even for experienced hysteroscopists.

Keywords: Cervical stenosis; Hysteroscopy; Infertility; Therapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Uterine cervix with moderate fibrotic synechia during hysteroscopic evaluation
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
A Severe fibrotic synechiae completely distorting the cervical canal; B Mild synechia on the left lateral wall
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Technique of adhesiolysis using a 5 Fr grasper. Since moderate fibrotic adhesions hide a clear passage through the cervix, the 5 Fr grasper is passed into the fibrotic tissue A, creating a small opening of the way B. With a continuous opening and closing of the grasp jaws, the lumen is further enlarged allowing the hysteroscope to pass into the uterine cavity C–D
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Severe stenosis of cervical canal with a keyhole-shaped external cervical os A. A 5-Fr bipolar electrode is carefully inserted into the stenotic ostium B, then a cut is made along the four cardinal points performing a star-shaped incision in order to create an adequate access to the uterine caity C
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
5 Fr graduated intrauterine palpator used to perform the lysis of severe fibrotic cervical adhesions

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aydeniz B, Gruber IV, Schauf B, et al. A multicenter survey of complications associated with 21 676 operative hysteroscopies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2002;104:160–164. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(02)00106-9. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jansen FW, Vredevoogd CB, Van Ulzen K, et al. Complications of hysteroscopy: a prospective, multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;96:266–270. doi: 10.1016/S0029-7844(00)00865-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bettocchi S, Bramante S, Bifulco G, et al. Challenging the cervix: strategies to overcome the anatomic impediments to hysteroscopy: analysis of 31,052 office hysteroscopies. Fertil Steril. 2016;105:e16–e17. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.01.030. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pluchino N, Ninni F, Angioni S, et al. Office vaginoscopic hysteroscopy in infertile women: effects of gynecologist experience, instrument size, and distention medium on patient discomfort. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17:344–350. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2010.01.015. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019 doi: 10.1186/S41073-019-0064-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types