Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 10:25:e37140.
doi: 10.2196/37140.

Direct and Indirect Effects of a Web-Based Educational and Communication Skills Intervention "Promotoras de Donación" to Increase Donor Designation in Latinx Communities: Evaluation Study

Affiliations

Direct and Indirect Effects of a Web-Based Educational and Communication Skills Intervention "Promotoras de Donación" to Increase Donor Designation in Latinx Communities: Evaluation Study

Heather Gardiner et al. J Med Internet Res. .

Abstract

Background: Latinx populations are severely underrepresented among organ donors compared with the non-Hispanic White population. The Promotoras de Donación e-learning module was developed to train Latinx lay health educators (ie, promotoras) to discuss deceased organ donation and promote donor designation within their communities.

Objective: This paper described the results of 2 studies designed to assess the direct and indirect effects of the module on promotoras' and mature Latinas' organ donation and donor designation knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors.

Methods: In partnership with 4 community-based promotoras organizations, we designed 2 nonrandomized, quasiexperimental pragmatic studies to evaluate the Promotoras de Donación e-learning module, with participating promotoras and mature Latinas serving as their own controls. Brief surveys were administered to participating promotoras before and after module completion to assess changes in organ donation knowledge and support and communication confidence (study 1). Promotoras participating in the first study were asked to hold at least 2 group conversations about organ donation and donor designation with mature Latinas (study 2); paper-pencil surveys were completed by all participants before and after the group conversations. Descriptive statistics, means and SDs, and counts and percentages were used as appropriate to categorize the samples. Paired sample 2-tailed t test was used to assess changes in knowledge of and support for organ donation and confidence in discussing donation and promoting donor designation from pre- to posttest.

Results: Overall, 40 promotoras completed this module (study 1). Increases in organ donation knowledge (mean 6.0, SD 1.9 to mean 6.2, SD 2.9) and support (mean 3.4, SD 0.9 to mean 3.6, SD 0.9) were observed from pre- to posttest; however, these changes did not reach statistical significance. A statistically significant increase in communication confidence was found (mean 692.1, SD 232.4 to mean 852.3, SD 139.7; P=.01). The module was well received, with most participants deeming it well organized, presenting new information, and providing realistic and helpful portrayals of donation conversations. A total of 52 group discussions with 375 attendees were led by 25 promotoras (study 2). The trained promotora-led group discussions about organ donation resulted in increased support for organ donation in promotoras and mature Latinas from pre- to posttest. Knowledge of the steps to become an organ donor and belief that the process is easy to perform increased in mature Latinas from pre- to posttest by 30.7% and 15.2%, respectively. In total, 5.6% (21/375) of attendees submitted completed organ donation registration forms.

Conclusions: This evaluation provides preliminary support for the module's direct and indirect effects on organ donation knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors. The need for additional modifications to and future evaluations of the module are discussed.

Keywords: Hispanic organ donation; Latina; Latino; Latinx; Spanish; awareness; community engagement; community outreach; digital learning; donor designation; donor registration; e-learning; education; organ donor; program evaluation; promotoras.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Similar articles

References

    1. Goldberg D, Lynch R. Improvements in organ donation: riding the coattails of a national tragedy. Clin Transplant. 2020 Jan;34(1):e13755. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13755. doi: 10.1111/ctr.13755. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Health Resources and Services Administration. [2022-12-07]. https://optn.transplant.hrsa.gov/data/view-data-reports/national-data/ - PubMed
    1. Eggers PW. Has the incidence of end-stage renal disease in the USA and other countries stabilized? Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2011 May;20(3):241–5. doi: 10.1097/MNH.0b013e3283454319. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yracheta JM, Alfonso J, Lanaspa MA, Roncal-Jimenez C, Johnson SB, Sánchez-Lozada LG, Johnson RJ. Hispanic Americans living in the United States and their risk for obesity, diabetes and kidney disease: genetic and environmental considerations. Postgrad Med. 2015 Jun;127(5):503–10. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2015.1021234. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2015.1021234. - DOI - DOI - PubMed
    1. Purnell TS, Powe NR, Troll MU, Wang NY, LaVeist TA, Boulware LE. Donor designation: racial and ethnic differences in US nondesignators' preferred methods for disclosing intent to donate organs. Transpl Int. 2011 Oct;24(10):999–1007. doi: 10.1111/j.1432-2277.2011.01301.x. https://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21777299 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types