Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 10;18(7):e0287984.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287984. eCollection 2023.

Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review

Deniz Mevlevioğlu  1 , Sabin Tabirca  1   2 , David Murphy  1
Affiliations

Anxiety classification in virtual reality using biosensors: A mini scoping review

Deniz Mevlevioğlu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Anxiety prediction can be used for enhancing Virtual Reality applications. We aimed to assess the evidence on whether anxiety can be accurately classified in Virtual Reality.

Methods: We conducted a scoping review using Scopus, Web of Science, IEEE Xplore, and ACM Digital Library as data sources. Our search included studies from 2010 to 2022. Our inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed studies which take place in a Virtual Reality environment and assess the user's anxiety using machine learning classification models and biosensors.

Results: 1749 records were identified and out of these, 11 (n = 237) studies were selected. Studies had varying numbers of outputs, from two outputs to eleven. Accuracy of anxiety classification for two-output models ranged from 75% to 96.4%; accuracy for three-output models ranged from 67.5% to 96.3%; accuracy for four-output models ranged from 38.8% to 86.3%. The most commonly used measures were electrodermal activity and heart rate.

Conclusion: Results show that it is possible to create high-accuracy models to determine anxiety in real time. However, it should be noted that there is a lack of standardisation when it comes to defining ground truth for anxiety, making these results difficult to interpret. Additionally, many of these studies included small samples consisting of mostly students, which may bias the results. Future studies should be very careful in defining anxiety and aim for a more inclusive and larger sample. It is also important to research the application of the classification by conducting longitudinal studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

NO authors have competing interests.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The search results [4].
Fig 2
Fig 2. Quality scores of each study [47].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Riva G. Applications of virtual environments in medicine. Methods of information in medicine. 2003;42(05):524–534. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1634379 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bound J, Brown C, Mathiowetz N. Measurement error in survey data. In: Handbook of econometrics. vol. 5. Elsevier; 2001. p. 3705–3843.
    1. Giannakakis G, Grigoriadis D, Giannakaki K, Simantiraki O, Roniotis A, Tsiknakis M. Review on psychological stress detection using biosignals. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing. 2019;. doi: 10.1109/taffc.2019.2927337 - DOI
    1. Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al.. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology. 2021;134:103–112. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Psychological Association. Anxiety; 2022. [Online]. Available from: https://www.apa.org/topics/anxiety, Last accessed 20th April 2023.

Publication types