Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2023 Jul 10;13(1):11174.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-37652-6.

Prevalence of surgical site infections after open reduction and internal fixation for mandibular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence of surgical site infections after open reduction and internal fixation for mandibular fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Evangelos Kostares et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Our study aims to estimate the prevalence of surgical site infections (SSI) following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for mandibular fractures and to determine the effect of potential moderators on it. A systematic literature search (Medline and Scopus databases) was conducted independently by two reviewers. The pooled prevalence with 95% confidence intervals was estimated. Quality assessment as well as outlier and influential analysis were performed. Additionally, subgroup and meta-regression analysis were conducted in order the effect of categorical and continuous variables on the estimated prevalence to be investigated. In total, seventy-five eligible studies (comprising a sum of 5825 participants) were included in this meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of SSI following ORIF for mandibular fractures was estimated as high as 4.2% (95% CI 3.0-5.6%) with significant heterogeneity between studies. One study was identified to be critically influential. In the subgroup analysis, the prevalence was 4.2% (95% CI 2.2-6.6%) among studies conducted in Europe, 4.3% (95% CI 3.1-5.6%) among studies conducted in Asia and higher among those conducted in America (7.3%) (95% CI 4.7-10.3%). It is important for healthcare professionals to be aware of the etiology of these infections, despite the relatively low rate of SSI in these procedures. However, further, well-designed prospective and retrospective studies need to be conducted in order this issue to be fully clarified.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart depicting the systematic search results from the relevant studies’ identification and selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot evaluating the calculated prevalence of SSI following ORIF for mandibular fractures using random-effects model.

References

    1. Ludi EK, Rohatgi S, Zygmont ME, Khosa F, Hanna TN. Do radiologists and surgeons speak the same language? A retrospective review of facial trauma. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2016;207(5):1070–1076. doi: 10.2214/AJR.15.15901. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pickrell B, Serebrakian A, Maricevich R. Mandible fractures. Semin. Plast. Surg. 2017;31(02):100–107. doi: 10.1055/s-0037-1601374. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yuen, H.-W., Hohman, M. H. & Mazzoni, T. Mandible fracture. [online] PubMed. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507705/ (2021). - PubMed
    1. Gerbino G, Boffano P, Bosco GF. Symphyseal mandibular fractures associated with bicondylar fractures: A retrospective analysis. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2009;67(8):1656–1660. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2009.03.069. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ferneini EM. Mandibular fractures. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 2021;79(12):2603–2605. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2021.08.264. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types