Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 10;23(1):504.
doi: 10.1186/s12884-023-05803-2.

Achievement of appropriate cesarean rates using Robson's 10-Group classification system in Brazilian private practice

Andrea Silveira de Queiroz Campos  1 , Daphne Rattner  2 , Carmen Simone Grilo Diniz  3
Affiliations

Achievement of appropriate cesarean rates using Robson's 10-Group classification system in Brazilian private practice

Andrea Silveira de Queiroz Campos et al. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. .

Abstract

Background: Increasing cesarean section (CS) rates are a global concern because they are related to higher maternal and neonatal complication rates and do not provide positive childbirth experiences. In 2019, Brazil ranked second globally, given its overall CS rate of 57%. According to the World Health Organization (WHO), populational CS rates of 10-15% are associated with decreased maternal, neonatal, and infant mortality rates. This study aimed to investigate whether multidisciplinary care following evidence-based protocols associated with a high motivation of both women and professionals for a vaginal birth leads to less overuse of CS in a Brazilian private practice (PP).

Methods: This cross-sectional study evaluated CS rates by Robson group for women who sought vaginal birth in a private practice in Brazil comparing with Swedish data. Collaborative care of midwives and obstetricians who adopted evidence-based guidelines was offered. CS rates, overall and by Robson group, contribution of each Robson group to the overall CS rate, clinical and nonclinical interventions, vaginal birth, pre-labor CS, and intrapartum CS proportions were estimated. The expected CS rate was calculated using the World Health Organization C-model tool. The analysis used Microsoft Excel and R Studio (version 1.2.1335. 2009-2019).

Results: The PP overall CS rate was 15.1% (95%CI, 13.4-17.1%) versus the 19.8% (95%CI, 14.8-24.7%) rate expected by the WHO C-model tool. The population included 43.7% women in Robson Group 1 (nulliparous, single, cephalic, at term, spontaneous labor), 11.4% in Group 2 (nulliparous, single, cephalic, at term, induced labor or CS before labor), and 14.9% in Group 5 (multiparous women with previous CS), the greatest contributors to higher CS rates (75.4% of them). The Swedish overall CS rate was 17.9% (95%CI, 17.6-18.1%) in a population of 27% women in Robson Group 1, 10.7% in Group 2, and 9.2% in Group 5.

Conclusions: Multidisciplinary care following evidence-based protocols, associated with high motivation of both women and professionals for vaginal birth, may lead to a significant and safe reduction of CS rates even in contexts such as Brazil, with high medicalization of obstetric care and excess CS.

Keywords: Cesarean section rates; Health Care Models; Humanized childbirth; Patient-centered care, evidence-based practice; Robson classification.; Supplementary health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
The Robson Classification with subdivisions Source: Authors’ elaboration based on World Health Organization data (2017) [2]. CS, cesarean section
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Robson group sizes and CS rates by common characteristics, private practice, Brazil, 2004–2019 and Sweden, 2019 Source: PP [17] data and SFOG [15] Notes: 1 and 2: nulliparous, term, singleton, vertex 3 and 4: multiparous, term, singleton, vertex, with no CS 5 previous CS 6, 7, and 9: noncephalic presentation 8: twins 10: preterm CS, cesarean section; PP, private practice; S, Sweden
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Betrán AP, Ye J, Moller A-B, Zhang J, Gülmezoglu AM, Torloni MR. The increasing Trend in caesarean section rates: Global, Regional and National estimates: 1990–2014. PLoS ONE. 2016;11. 10.1371/journal.pone.0148343. - PMC - PubMed
    1. WHO - World Health Organization. Robson classification: implementation manual. 2017 https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/259512 (accessed Aug 29, 2021).
    1. Robson MS. Classification of caesarean sections. Fetal Matern Med Rev. 2001;12:23–39. doi: 10.1017/S0965539501000122. - DOI
    1. WHO - World Health Organization, RHR - Department of Reproductive Health and Research. WHO Statement on Caesarean Section Rates. Geneva, 2015 https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/161442/WHO_RHR_15.02_en... (accessed Nov 18, 2021).
    1. DASNT - Departamento de Análise em Saúde e Vigilância das Doenças Não Transmissíveis. Painel de Monitoramento de Nascidos Vivos. 2021. http://svs.aids.gov.br/dantps/centrais-de-conteudos/paineis-de-monitoram....