Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 Jul 10;9(1):50.
doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00452-3.

Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities

Samantha Yimeng Dong  1   2 , Linda Nguyen  2   3 , Andrea Cross  2   3   4 , Amanda Doherty-Kirby  5 , Jessica Geboers  5   6 , Dayle McCauley  2   6 , Alice Kelen Soper  2   3   4 , Amanda St Dennis  5   6 , Danny Steeves  5   6 , Natasha Trehan  5   7 , Jan Willem Gorter  8   9   10
Affiliations

Youth engagement in research: exploring training needs of youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities

Samantha Yimeng Dong et al. Res Involv Engagem. .

Abstract

Background: Authentic researcher-youth partnerships in patient-oriented research (POR) where the research responds to the needs expressed by youth themselves are essential to make research meaningful. While patient-oriented research (POR) is increasingly practiced, few training programs exist in Canada and none, to our knowledge, are tailored for youth with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD). Our primary objective was to explore the training needs of youth (ages 18-25) with NDD to enhance their knowledge, confidence, and skills as research partners. Our secondary objective was to identify the benefits and challenges of engaging youth with NDD in a POR approach.

Methods: Our team of four youth and one parent with lived experience [Youth Engagement in Research (YER) partners] and six researchers engaged in POR to investigate the primary objective via two phases: (1) individual interviews with youth living with NDD and (2) a two-day virtual symposium with focus groups with youth and researchers. Collaborative qualitative content analysis was employed to synthesize the data. Our secondary objective was assessed by asking our YER partners to complete the Public and Patient Engagement Evaluation Tool (PPEET) survey and participate in reflective discussions.

Results: Phase 1 participants (n = 7) identified various barriers and facilitators to their engagement in research and offered suggestions to meet their needs through minimizing barriers and integrating facilitators, which would subsequently enhance their knowledge, confidence, and skills as research partners. Informed by phase 1, phase 2 participants (n = 17) prioritized the following POR training needs: researcher-youth communication, research roles and responsibilities, and finding partnership opportunities. For delivery methods, participants stated the importance of youth representation, using Universal Design for Learning, and co-learning between youth and researchers. Based on the PPEET data and subsequent discussions, YER partners agreed that they were able to express views freely, feel that their views were heard, and that their participation made a meaningful difference. Challenges included scheduling difficulties, ensuring multiple methods for engagement, and working under short timelines.

Conclusion: This study identified important training needs for youth with NDD and for researchers to engage in meaningful POR, which can subsequently inform the co-production of accessible training opportunities with and for youth.

Keywords: Disability; Engagement; Inclusion; Patient-oriented research; Training; Youth.

Plain language summary

Partnerships between researchers and youth, known as patient-oriented research (POR), are needed to make sure research is meaningful to youth. Our main goal was to explore the training needs of youth (ages 18-25) with neurodevelopmental disabilities (NDD) to enhance their knowledge, confidence, and skills as research partners. To find out, our team of four youth and one parent with lived experience (YER partners) and six researchers completed this project in two parts: 1) interviews with youth and 2) a two-day virtual workshop with youth and researchers. Data from the two parts were reviewed to answer our question. We learned from Part 1 that the needs of participants can be met by providing support and reducing barriers in POR. From Part 2, the top three important topics in partnerships were: researcher-youth communication, research roles and responsibilities, and finding partnership opportunities. Participants in the workshop emphasized having different youth represented, using a framework that allows learning for everyone, and co-learning between youth and researchers in the creation of learning materials. Our second goal was to understand the benefits and challenges of our partnership. To assess, YER partners completed a survey and reflected about their experiences. YER partners agreed on being able to express views, feel that their views were heard, and that their participation made a meaningful difference. Challenges included scheduling difficulties, providing multiple ways to partner, and working under short timelines. Overall, the study described important POR needs for youth and researchers, which can inform future training opportunities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Individual and contextual barriers (−) and facilitators ( +) in POR based on direct content analysis
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research: Strategy for Patient-Oriented Research Patient Engagement Framework [Internet]. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. 2019. Available from: https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/48413.html
    1. Miller AR, Rosenbaum P. Perspectives on “disease” and “disability” in child health: the case of childhood neurodisability. Front Public Health. 2016;4:226. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00226. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baumgardner DJ. Defining patient-oriented research for the average person (and potential research partner) J Patient Cent Res Rev. 2019;6(1):4–6. doi: 10.17294/2330-0698.1697. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Domecq JP, Prutsky G, Elraiyah T, Wang Z, Nabhan M, Shippee N, et al. Patient engagement in research: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;26(14):89. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-89. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Flynn R, Walton S, Scott SD. Engaging children and families in pediatric Health Research: a scoping review. Res Involv Engagem. 2019;5:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s40900-019-0168-9. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources