Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 19;23(10):4885.
doi: 10.3390/s23104885.

An IoT-Enabled E-Nose for Remote Detection and Monitoring of Airborne Pollution Hazards Using LoRa Network Protocol

Affiliations

An IoT-Enabled E-Nose for Remote Detection and Monitoring of Airborne Pollution Hazards Using LoRa Network Protocol

Kanak Kumar et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Detection and monitoring of airborne hazards using e-noses has been lifesaving and prevented accidents in real-world scenarios. E-noses generate unique signature patterns for various volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and, by leveraging artificial intelligence, detect the presence of various VOCs, gases, and smokes onsite. Widespread monitoring of airborne hazards across many remote locations is possible by creating a network of gas sensors using Internet connectivity, which consumes significant power. Long-range (LoRa)-based wireless networks do not require Internet connectivity while operating independently. Therefore, we propose a networked intelligent gas sensor system (N-IGSS) which uses a LoRa low-power wide-area networking protocol for real-time airborne pollution hazard detection and monitoring. We developed a gas sensor node by using an array of seven cross-selective tin-oxide-based metal-oxide semiconductor (MOX) gas sensor elements interfaced with a low-power microcontroller and a LoRa module. Experimentally, we exposed the sensor node to six classes i.e., five VOCs plus ambient air and as released by burning samples of tobacco, paints, carpets, alcohol, and incense sticks. Using the proposed two-stage analysis space transformation approach, the captured dataset was first preprocessed using the standardized linear discriminant analysis (SLDA) method. Four different classifiers, namely AdaBoost, XGBoost, Random Forest (RF), and Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP), were then trained and tested in the SLDA transformation space. The proposed N-IGSS achieved "all correct" identification of 30 unknown test samples with a low mean squared error (MSE) of 1.42 × 10-4 over a distance of 590 m.

Keywords: Internet of Things (IoT); airborne pollution hazard; intelligent gas sensor system (IGSS); long range (LoRa); low-power wide-area network (LPWAN).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Block schematic diagram of the networked intelligent gas sensor system (N-IGSS).
Figure 2
Figure 2
(ac) The proposed architecture of the networked intelligent gas sensor system (N-IGSS).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Connection diagram of (a) sensor node (transmitter) and (b) gateway (receiver module), as interfaced with the microcontroller and LoRa module.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Basic circuit diagram of the N-IGSS: (a) sensor node and (b) receiver gateway at the RDPS.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Basic circuit diagram of the N-IGSS: (a) sensor node and (b) receiver gateway at the RDPS.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Physical prototype of N-IGSS: (a) sensor node, (b) receiver gateway at the RDPS. 1: Gas sensor array; 2: temperature and humidity sensor; 3: LoRa module (Tx); 4: microcontroller (Tx); 5: antenna (Tx); 6: power supply (DC, 5 V); 7: LoRa module (Rx); 8: antenna (Rx); 9: microcontroller (Rx).
Figure 6
Figure 6
Block schematic diagram of process for obtaining 3D scatter plot.
Figure 7
Figure 7
3D scatter plot of SLDA-transformed dataset.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Block schematic diagram of proposed classifiers.
Figure 9
Figure 9
AdaBoost classification model.
Figure 10
Figure 10
XGBoost classification model.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Random Forest classification model.
Figure 12
Figure 12
MLP classification model (a,b).
Figure 13
Figure 13
Performance of AdaBoost, XGBoost, RF, and MLP classifiers.
Figure 14
Figure 14
Performance of MLP classifier.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Confusion matrix of the MLP classifier.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. WHO Household Air Pollution and Health. [(accessed on 28 January 2020)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/en/news-room/factsheets/detail/household-air-polluti....
    1. Kumar P., Imam B. Footprints of air pollution and changing environment on the sustainability of built infrastructure. Sci. Total. Environ. 2013;444:85–101. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.056. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hromadka J., Korposh S., Partridge M.C., James S.W., Davis F., Crump D., Tatam R.P. Multi-parameter measurements using optical fibre long period gratings for indoor air quality monitoring. Sens. Actuat. B Chem. 2017;244:217–225. doi: 10.1016/j.snb.2016.12.050. - DOI
    1. Kureshi R.R., Thakker D., Mishra B.K., Barnes J. From Raising Awareness to a Behavioural Change: A Case Study of Indoor Air Quality Improvement Using IoT and COM-B Model. Sensors. 2023;23:3613. doi: 10.3390/s23073613. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shahjalal M., Hasan M.K., Islam M.M., Alam M.M., Ahmed M.F., Jang Y.M. An over-view of AI-enabled remote smart-home monitoring system using LoRa; Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Artificial Intel-ligence in Information and Communication (ICAIIC); Fukuoka, Japan. 19–21 February 2020; pp. 510–513.

LinkOut - more resources