Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 20;11(20):3283.
doi: 10.3390/foods11203283.

Red and Processed Meat Consumption in Poland

Affiliations

Red and Processed Meat Consumption in Poland

Katarzyna Stoś et al. Foods. .

Abstract

The aim of the study was to assess the quantity and frequency of meat consumption, especially of red and processed meat, in Poland. The amount of meat consumed was assessed using data from household budget surveys undertaken in 2000, 2010, and 2020. The frequency of consumption was assessed using Food Propensity Questionnaire data from 1831 adults in 2019-2020. Poles consumed 1.35 kg of unprocessed red meat and 1.96 kg of total processed meat per person per month in 2020. The consumption of red meat was lower than in the two previous decades; the consumption of processed meat fluctuated. Pork was the most commonly consumed red meat: 40% of adults consumed pork 2-3 times a week. Beef and other unprocessed red meat were most often consumed less than once a month (29.1%). Processed meat was often consumed: 37.8% of adults ate cold cuts, and 34.9% ate sausages and bacon 2-3 times a week. The consumption of red and processed meat in Poland was high and frequent. In particular, the consumption of processed meat exceeded the recommendations and might increase the risk of chronic diseases. It is necessary to implement activities aimed at reducing the consumption of red and processed meat in Poland.

Keywords: adults; amount and frequency of consumption; households; processed meat; red meat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Total meat and meat product consumption in Polish households in 2000, 2010, and 2020 in terms of place of living and socio-economic group (kg/person/month).

References

    1. Kunachowicz H., Nadolna I., Przygoda B., Iwanow K. Tabele Składu i Wartości Odżywczej Żywności [Food Composition Tables] Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; Warsaw, Poland: 2005. (In Polish)
    1. EFSA NDA Panel (EFSA Panel on Nutrition, Novel Foods and Food Allergens) Turck D., Bohn T., Castenmiller J., de Henauw S., Hirsch-Ernst K.I., Knutsen H.K., Maciuk A., Mangelsdorf I., Mc Ardle H.J., et al. Scientific Opinion on the scientific advice related to nutrient profiling for the development of harmonised mandatory front-of-pack nutrition labelling and the setting of nutrient profiles for restricting nutrition and health claims on foods. EFSA J. 2022;20:e07259. doi: 10.2903/j.efsa.2022.7259. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Papier K., Knuppel A., Syam N., Jebb S.A., Key T.J. Meat consumption and risk of ischemic heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2021;20:1–12. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2021.1949575. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Møller S.P., Mejborn H., Christensen A.I., Biltoft-Jensen A., Thygesen L.C. Meat consumption, stratified by dietary quality, and risk of heart disease. Br. J. Nutr. 2021;126:1881–1887. doi: 10.1017/S0007114521000623. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guasch-Ferré M., Satija A., Blondin S.A., Janiszewski M., Emlen E., O’Connor L.E., Campbell W.W., Hu F.B., Willett W.C., Stampfer M.J. Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials of Red Meat Consumption in Comparison With Various Comparison Diets on Cardiovascular Risk Factors. Circulation. 2019;139:1828–1845. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.035225. - DOI - PubMed