Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Oct 21;11(20):3295.
doi: 10.3390/foods11203295.

Effects of Different Processing Methods of Coffee Arabica on Colour, Acrylamide, Caffeine, Chlorogenic Acid, and Polyphenol Content

Affiliations

Effects of Different Processing Methods of Coffee Arabica on Colour, Acrylamide, Caffeine, Chlorogenic Acid, and Polyphenol Content

Olga Cwiková et al. Foods. .

Abstract

An effect of a processing method (dry and wet) and a degree of roasting (light, medium, and dark) of 15 coffee (Coffea arabica) samples on the content of caffeine, chlorogenic acid (CQA), total polyphenols (TPP), acrylamide (AA), and on the colour parameters L*, a*, and b* was evaluated. Neither processing nor roasting affected caffeine content (p > 0.05). The degree of roasting accounted for 46% and 72% of explained variability of the CQA content and AA content, respectively (p < 0.05). AA content was in the range from 250 (wet-processed, light-roasted samples) to 305 µg·kg-1 (wet-processed, dark-roasted coffees), but the dark roasting only tended (p > 0.05) to increase AA content. Wet-processed, dry-roasted coffee had higher (p < 0.05) TPP content (48.5 mg·g-1) than its dry-processed, dry-roasted counterpart (42.5 mg·g-1); the method of processing accounted for 70% of explained variability of TPP. Both the method of processing and the degree of roasting affected the L*, a*, and b* values (p < 0.01), but the lower values (p < 0.05) of these parameters in the dark-roasted samples were found only within the wet processing. A negative correlation between the AA content and lightness (L*) was established (r = -0.39, p < 0.05). It was concluded that from the consumers' viewpoint, the results of the present study indicate relatively small differences in quality parameters of coffee irrespective of the method of processing or degree of roasting.

Keywords: GC/MS chromatography; Maillard reaction; colour assessment; degree of roasting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Insanu M., Fidrianny I., Imtinan N.H.H., Kusmardiyani S. Liberica Coffee (Coffea liberica L.) from Three Different Regions: In Vitro Antioxidant Activities. Biointerface Res. Appl. Chem. 2021;11:13031–13041. doi: 10.33263/BRIAC115.1303113041. - DOI
    1. Aguilar-Alvarez M.E., Saucedo-Castañeda G., Durand N., Perraud-Gaime I., Gonzalez-Robles R.O., Rodríguez-Serrano G.M. The variety, roasting, processing, and type of cultivation determine the low OTA levels of commercialized coffee in Chiapas State, Mexico. Food Control. 2021;126:108088. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108088. - DOI
    1. Alonso-Salces R.M., Serra F., Reniero F., Héberger K. Botanical and Geographical Characterization of Green Coffee (Coffea arabica and Coffea canephora): Chemometric Evaluation of Phenolic and Methylxanthine Contents. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2009;57:4224–4235. doi: 10.1021/jf8037117. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Davis A.P., Gole T.W., Baena S., Moat J. The Impact of Climate Change on Indigenous Arabica Coffee (Coffea arabica): Predicting Future Trends and Identifying Priorities. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047981. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bermeo-Andrade H., Bahamón-Monje A.F., Aragón-Calderón R., Beltrán-Vargas Y., Gutiérrez-Guzmán N. Is Coffee (Coffea arabica L.) Quality Related to a Combined Farmer–Farm Profile? Sustainability. 2020;12:9518. doi: 10.3390/su12229518. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources