Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Jun 9;15(6):e40192.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.40192. eCollection 2023 Jun.

Chondroitin Sulfate Supplements for Osteoarthritis: A Critical Review

Affiliations
Review

Chondroitin Sulfate Supplements for Osteoarthritis: A Critical Review

Rui Brito et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Over the years, chondroitin sulfate (CS) has been used as a slow-acting drug for the treatment of osteoarthritis, for the reduction of pain and improvement of function, and for its disease-modifying properties by limiting cartilage volume loss and joint space narrowing progression. However, there have been inconsistencies in published trials regarding clinical efficacy, with reports of a lack of significant effects compared to placebo. The therapeutic effects of chondroitin sulfate may depend on many variables, such as the source of origin, purity, and contamination with by-products. Another source of confusion may be related to the fact that CS is commonly combined with glucosamine, which makes it challenging to isolate the specific contribution of chondroitin to the therapeutic outcome. This is aggravated by the fact that CS supplements, used in many countries, are not regulated, and labels wrongly claim high levels of purity. Many of these inferior CS products may have been used in clinical trials, which may have had limited but significant results. This has led to recent recommendations to opt for higher-purity pharmacologic-grade CS for the treatment of OA. This article aims to provide an up-to-date view of the current literature regarding the biological effects and efficacy of CS and discusses the quality of available chondroitin sulfate supplements and the current direction in CS investigation. This review concludes that pharmacologic-grade CS supplements may have clinically significant benefits when properly standardized; however, high-quality evidence from properly designed clinical trials is still needed to draw definitive conclusions about clinical efficacy in osteoarthritis.

Keywords: chondroitin sulfate; chondroprotection; joint health; osteoarthritis; supplementation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Risk factors associated with the loss of cartilage volume on weight-bearing areas in knee osteoarthritis patients assessed by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: a longitudinal study. Pelletier JP, Raynauld JP, Berthiaume MJ, et al. Arthritis Res Ther. 2007;9:0. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) for 291 diseases and injuries in 21 regions, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Murray CJ, Vos T, Lozano R, et al. Lancet. 2012;380:2197–2223. - PubMed
    1. Burden of major musculoskeletal conditions. Woolf AD, Pfleger B. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2572542/ Bull World Health Organ. 2003;81:646–656. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Skeletal muscle wasting and its relationship with osteoarthritis: a mini-review of mechanisms and current interventions. Shorter E, Sannicandro AJ, Poulet B, Goljanek-Whysall K. Curr Rheumatol Rep. 2019;21:40. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Balance control and knee osteoarthritis severity. Kim HS, Yun DH, Yoo SD, et al. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011;35:701–709. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources